QINT vs. DGRE
QINT (American Century Quality Diversified International ETF) and DGRE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both Quality Factor funds. QINT is passively managed, while DGRE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QINT returned 9.64%/yr vs 8.52%/yr for DGRE. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QINT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for DGRE.
Performance
QINT vs. DGRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QINT achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly lower than DGRE's 22.89% return.
QINT
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.32%
DGRE
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- YTD
- 22.89%
- 1Y
- 42.31%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $225.72K | $519.73K | $485.46K | |
| $2.00M | $2.83M | $3.27M |
QINT vs. DGRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 11.64% | 38.12% | 6.53% | 20.36% | -19.75% | 9.29% | 17.95% | 23.46% | -14.13% |
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 22.89% | 27.47% | 3.63% | 18.46% | -21.86% | 2.55% | 10.85% | 21.12% | -3.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between QINT and DGRE is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018 | 0.74 |
The correlation between QINT and DGRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
QINT vs. DGRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QINT
DGRE
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
QINT
DGRE
Industrials
QINT
DGRE
Consumer Cyclical
QINT
DGRE
Healthcare
QINT
DGRE
Technology
QINT
DGRE
Basic Materials
QINT
DGRE
Consumer Defensive
QINT
DGRE
Energy
QINT
DGRE
Communication Services
QINT
DGRE
Utilities
QINT
DGRE
Real Estate
QINT
DGRE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QINT vs. DGRE — Risk / Return Rank
QINT
DGRE
QINT vs. DGRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QINT | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.32 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 3.07 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.36 | 9.68 | -0.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QINT vs. DGRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QINT drawdown since its inception was -33.86%, smaller than the maximum DGRE drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QINT and DGRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QINT | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.86% | -36.95% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.41% | -13.68% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.56% | -20.65% | +7.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.86% | -33.43% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -9.16% | +8.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.42% | -11.93% | +4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 4.33% | -1.51% |
Volatility
QINT vs. DGRE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) is 4.78%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a volatility of 8.92%. This indicates that QINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QINT | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 8.92% | -4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.56% | 22.64% | -9.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 24.24% | -8.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 19.08% | -2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 19.98% | -1.94% |
QINT vs. DGRE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QINT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
QINT vs. DGRE - Dividend Comparison
QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than DGRE's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.90% | 2.22% | 4.38% | 2.56% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 3.12% | 3.18% | 3.01% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 2.43% | 2.66% | 3.49% | 3.12% | 3.56% | 2.30% | 1.61% | 1.83% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QINT and DGRE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGRE has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to QINT (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QINT dropped -33.86% vs DGRE's -36.95%.
On 5-year performance, QINT leads with 9.64% vs 8.52% for DGRE. On fees, DGRE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, QINT has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QINT has performed better with a 9.64% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QINT.
QINT has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 1.35% for DGRE.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QINT and 0.32% for DGRE.
DGRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QINT and DGRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer