PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QIDX vs. TUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QIDX vs. TUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) and First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QIDX having a 7.55% return and TUSA slightly lower at 7.45%.


QIDX

1D
0.54%
1M
1.38%
YTD
7.55%
6M
7.16%
1Y
12.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TUSA

1D
0.85%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
7.45%
6M
7.32%
1Y
19.84%
3Y*
16.73%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
10.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QIDX vs. TUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QIDX and TUSA is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

0.75

The correlation between QIDX and TUSA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QIDX vs. TUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QIDX
QIDX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
QIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
QIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

TUSA
TUSA Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIDX vs. TUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) and First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QIDXTUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.27

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.03

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.77

8.12

-2.35

QIDX vs. TUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the TUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIDX and TUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QIDXTUSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

1.55

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.32

+0.46

Drawdowns

QIDX vs. TUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIDX drawdown since its inception was -14.99%, smaller than the maximum TUSA drawdown of -56.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIDX and TUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QIDXTUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.99%

-56.53%

+41.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.92%

-6.57%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.65%

+3.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-9.87%

+7.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.45%

-0.35%

Volatility

QIDX vs. TUSA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) is 2.83%, while First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that QIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QIDXTUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

3.58%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.32%

8.90%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.98%

12.90%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.59%

17.65%

-3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.59%

20.14%

-5.55%

QIDX vs. TUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIDX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TUSA's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

QIDX vs. TUSA - Dividend Comparison

QIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than TUSA's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QIDX
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF
0.86%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
1.64%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


QIDX and TUSA have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TUSA has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to QIDX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIDX dropped -14.99% vs TUSA's -56.53%.

On 1-year performance, TUSA leads with 19.84% vs 12.06% for QIDX. On fees, QIDX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QIDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TUSA has performed better with a 19.84% return vs 12.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QIDX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.

TUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.86% for QIDX.

They also come from different issuers: Indexperts and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for QIDX and 0.70% for TUSA.

TUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QIDX and TUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer