QIDX vs. SIXL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QIDX (Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF) and SIXL (ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QIDX returned 12.24% vs 4.09% for SIXL. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QIDX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SIXL.

Performance

QIDX vs. SIXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIDX achieves a 7.45% return, which is significantly higher than SIXL's 3.58% return.

QIDX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 1.25%
• YTD: 7.45%
• 6M: 7.61%
• 1Y: 12.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SIXL

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -3.27%
• YTD: 3.58%
• 6M: 2.46%
• 1Y: 4.09%
• 3Y*: 7.66%
• 5Y*: 3.56%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QIDX vs. SIXL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF	7.45%	8.16%
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	3.58%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between QIDX and SIXL is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025	0.67

The correlation between QIDX and SIXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QIDX vs. SIXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QIDX

QIDX Risk / Return Rank: 32
QIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
QIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
QIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
QIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
QIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

SIXL

SIXL Risk / Return Rank: 15
SIXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
SIXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
SIXL Omega Ratio Rank: 14
SIXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
SIXL Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIDX vs. SIXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QIDX	SIXL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	0.43	+0.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	0.66	+1.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.08	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	0.55	+1.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.89	1.57	+4.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QIDX vs. SIXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the SIXL Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIDX and SIXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QIDX	SIXL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	0.43	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.63	+0.15

Drawdowns

QIDX vs. SIXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIDX drawdown since its inception was -14.99%, smaller than the maximum SIXL drawdown of -16.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIDX and SIXL.

Drawdown Indicators

	QIDX	SIXL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.99%	-16.08%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.92%	-6.52%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.65%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.89%	+5.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-4.57%	+2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	2.28%	-0.18%

Volatility

QIDX vs. SIXL - Volatility Comparison

Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) at 2.41%. This indicates that QIDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QIDX	SIXL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.95%	2.41%	+0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.33%	6.70%	+1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.97%	9.51%	+1.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.62%	12.14%	+2.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.62%	12.56%	+2.06%

QIDX vs. SIXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIDX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SIXL's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

QIDX vs. SIXL - Dividend Comparison

QIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than SIXL's 2.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF	0.86%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	2.30%	2.31%	1.28%	1.48%	1.45%	0.67%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QIDX and SIXL in my portfolio?

QIDX and SIXL have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QIDX or SIXL?

QIDX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to SIXL (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIDX dropped -14.99% vs SIXL's -16.08%.

Which ETF is better, QIDX or SIXL?

On 1-year performance, QIDX leads with 12.24% vs 4.09% for SIXL. On fees, SIXL is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, SIXL has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QIDX or SIXL?

Over the 1-year period, QIDX has performed better with a 12.24% return vs 4.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QIDX or SIXL?

SIXL is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QIDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QIDX or SIXL?

SIXL has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 0.86% for QIDX.

What is the main difference between QIDX and SIXL?

They also come from different issuers: Indexperts and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for QIDX and 0.47% for SIXL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.