QIDX vs. RILA

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QIDX (Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF) and RILA (Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QIDX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Indexperts, while RILA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Indexperts. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QIDX returned 12.24% vs 15.05% for RILA. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

QIDX vs. RILA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) and Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF (RILA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIDX achieves a 7.45% return, which is significantly higher than RILA's 6.91% return.

QIDX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 1.25%
• YTD: 7.45%
• 6M: 7.61%
• 1Y: 12.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RILA

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 8.59%
• YTD: 6.91%
• 6M: 6.13%
• 1Y: 15.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QIDX vs. RILA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF	7.45%	8.16%
RILA Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF	6.91%	15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between QIDX and RILA is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025	0.75

The correlation between QIDX and RILA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QIDX vs. RILA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QIDX

QIDX Risk / Return Rank: 32
QIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
QIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
QIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
QIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
QIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

RILA

RILA Risk / Return Rank: 24
RILA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
RILA Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
RILA Omega Ratio Rank: 25
RILA Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
RILA Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIDX vs. RILA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) and Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF (RILA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QIDX	RILA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	0.96	+0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	1.41	+0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.17	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	0.96	+0.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.89	2.88	+3.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QIDX vs. RILA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the RILA Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIDX and RILA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QIDX	RILA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	0.96	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.80	-0.03

Drawdowns

QIDX vs. RILA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIDX drawdown since its inception was -14.99%, smaller than the maximum RILA drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIDX and RILA.

Drawdown Indicators

	QIDX	RILA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.99%	-19.99%	+5.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.92%	-16.54%	+9.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.12%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-4.53%	+2.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	5.51%	-3.41%

Volatility

QIDX vs. RILA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) is 2.95%, while Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF (RILA) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that QIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RILA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QIDX	RILA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.95%	3.62%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.33%	11.95%	-3.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.97%	15.74%	-4.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.62%	20.24%	-5.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.62%	20.24%	-5.62%

QIDX vs. RILA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QIDX and RILA have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

QIDX vs. RILA - Dividend Comparison

QIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than RILA's 0.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF	0.86%	0.84%
RILA Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF	0.10%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QIDX and RILA in my portfolio?

QIDX and RILA have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QIDX or RILA?

RILA has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to QIDX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIDX dropped -14.99% vs RILA's -19.99%.

Which ETF is better, QIDX or RILA?

On 1-year performance, RILA leads with 15.05% vs 12.24% for QIDX. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, QIDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QIDX or RILA?

Over the 1-year period, RILA has performed better with a 15.05% return vs 12.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QIDX or RILA?

QIDX and RILA have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QIDX or RILA?

QIDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.10% for RILA.

What is the main difference between QIDX and RILA?

QIDX is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while RILA is Large Cap Growth Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.