QIBGX vs. SCLAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

QIBGX (Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund) and SCLAX (SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, QIBGX returned 10.95%/yr vs 3.16%/yr for SCLAX. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QIBGX charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for SCLAX.

Performance

QIBGX vs. SCLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIBGX achieves a 5.62% return, which is significantly higher than SCLAX's 2.26% return. Over the past 10 years, QIBGX has outperformed SCLAX with an annualized return of 10.95%, while SCLAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.16% annualized return.

QIBGX

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 0.17%
• 6M: 5.01%
• YTD: 5.62%
• 1Y: 11.73%
• 3Y*: 17.53%
• 5Y*: 10.03%
• 10Y*: 10.95%
• ALL TIME*: 8.55%

SCLAX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -0.19%
• 6M: 1.46%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 1Y: 5.43%
• 3Y*: 5.49%
• 5Y*: 3.28%
• 10Y*: 3.16%
• ALL TIME*: 2.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QIBGX Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SCLAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

QIBGX vs. SCLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QIBGX Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund	5.62%	14.68%	28.30%	14.26%	-13.54%	17.43%	16.17%	19.00%	-2.96%	14.12%
SCLAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund	2.26%	6.49%	4.92%	6.96%	-3.74%	1.72%	3.30%	7.91%	-0.67%	3.88%

Correlation

The correlation between QIBGX and SCLAX is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.68

The correlation between QIBGX and SCLAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.72 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QIBGX vs. SCLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QIBGX

QIBGX Risk / Return Rank: 24
QIBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
QIBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
QIBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
QIBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
QIBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

SCLAX

SCLAX Risk / Return Rank: 76
SCLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
SCLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
SCLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
SCLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SCLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QIBGX vs. SCLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QIBGX	SCLAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	1.85	-1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	2.66	-1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.36	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	2.31	-1.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.59	8.90	-6.30

QIBGX vs. SCLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIBGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the SCLAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIBGX and SCLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QIBGX vs. SCLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIBGX drawdown since its inception was -42.95%, which is greater than SCLAX's maximum drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIBGX and SCLAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QIBGX	SCLAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.95%	-5.59%	-37.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.09%	-2.32%	-8.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.25%	-3.41%	-14.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.32%	-5.59%	-13.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.97%	-5.59%	-20.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-0.48%	-0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.56%	-1.14%	-4.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.31%	0.60%	+3.71%

Volatility

QIBGX vs. SCLAX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX) at 0.78%. This indicates that QIBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QIBGX	SCLAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.30%	0.78%	+1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.26%	2.33%	+4.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.07%	2.91%	+11.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.57%	3.12%	+12.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.21%	2.77%	+11.44%

QIBGX vs. SCLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIBGX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SCLAX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

QIBGX vs. SCLAX - Dividend Comparison

QIBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.39%, more than SCLAX's 1.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QIBGX Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund	8.39%	8.86%	20.13%	1.82%	6.92%	9.99%	4.36%	4.33%	10.60%	1.59%	1.86%	1.75%
SCLAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund	1.84%	1.88%	7.87%	4.06%	1.90%	2.79%	1.01%	4.67%	0.54%	3.77%	0.69%	1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QIBGX and SCLAX in my portfolio?

QIBGX and SCLAX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QIBGX or SCLAX?

QIBGX has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to SCLAX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIBGX dropped -42.95% vs SCLAX's -5.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.