PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QIBGX vs. QAMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QIBGX vs. QAMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QIBGX vs. QAMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QIBGX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund
-2.90%14.68%28.30%14.26%-13.54%4.71%
QAMNX
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A
1.36%10.00%17.33%4.71%9.19%12.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIBGX achieves a -2.90% return, which is significantly lower than QAMNX's 1.36% return.


QIBGX

1D
2.02%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
-2.90%
6M
-0.48%
1Y
11.77%
3Y*
15.96%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
10.44%

QAMNX

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
1.36%
6M
5.54%
1Y
7.82%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QIBGX vs. QAMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIBGX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than QAMNX's 1.86% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QIBGX vs. QAMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QIBGX
QIBGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
QIBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QIBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

QAMNX
QAMNX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QAMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
QAMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIBGX vs. QAMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QIBGXQAMNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

1.23

-0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

1.90

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

1.97

-0.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.72

5.71

-2.99

QIBGX vs. QAMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIBGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the QAMNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIBGX and QAMNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QIBGXQAMNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.23

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.87

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between QIBGX and QAMNX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QIBGX vs. QAMNX - Dividend Comparison

QIBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%, more than QAMNX's 1.51% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QIBGX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund
9.12%8.86%20.13%1.82%6.92%9.99%4.36%4.33%10.60%1.59%1.86%1.75%
QAMNX
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A
1.51%1.53%1.85%5.89%11.74%20.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QIBGX vs. QAMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIBGX drawdown since its inception was -42.95%, which is greater than QAMNX's maximum drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIBGX and QAMNX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QIBGXQAMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.95%

-17.97%

-24.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-4.16%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.30%

-0.42%

-8.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-5.25%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

1.44%

+2.56%

Volatility

QIBGX vs. QAMNX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX) at 1.03%. This indicates that QIBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QIBGXQAMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

1.03%

+2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

4.88%

+7.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.19%

6.38%

+8.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

14.04%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.19%

14.04%

+0.15%