QAMNX vs. QLEIX
QAMNX (Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A) and QLEIX (AQR Long-Short Equity Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 3 years, QAMNX returned 10.80%/yr vs 25.93%/yr for QLEIX. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QAMNX charges 1.86%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QLEIX.
Performance
QAMNX vs. QLEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QAMNX achieves a -1.55% return, which is significantly lower than QLEIX's -0.71% return.
QAMNX
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- -1.55%
- 6M
- -1.85%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 10.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLEIX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- 15.59%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 23.53%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
QAMNX vs. QLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A | -1.55% | 10.00% | 17.33% | 4.71% | 9.19% | 12.29% |
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund | -0.71% | 34.43% | 30.50% | 23.95% | 19.18% | 13.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between QAMNX and QLEIX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QAMNX vs. QLEIX — Risk / Return Rank
QAMNX
QLEIX
QAMNX vs. QLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QAMNX | QLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.38 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 2.53 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.44 | 7.87 | -6.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QAMNX vs. QLEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QAMNX drawdown since its inception was -17.97%, smaller than the maximum QLEIX drawdown of -38.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAMNX and QLEIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QAMNX | QLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -38.11% | +20.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.16% | -6.01% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.16% | -7.07% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.55% | -1.32% | -2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.12% | -7.70% | +2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 1.93% | -0.08% |
Volatility
QAMNX vs. QLEIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX) is 2.24%, while AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that QAMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QAMNX | QLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.24% | 2.82% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.24% | 5.76% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.70% | 7.37% | -0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 10.02% | +3.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 10.59% | +3.22% |
QAMNX vs. QLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QAMNX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than QLEIX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QAMNX vs. QLEIX - Dividend Comparison
QAMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than QLEIX's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A | 1.55% | 1.53% | 1.85% | 5.89% | 11.74% | 20.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund | 1.76% | 1.75% | 7.12% | 20.88% | 14.15% | 0.00% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 6.03% | 9.11% | 3.01% | 4.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QAMNX and QLEIX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLEIX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to QAMNX (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QAMNX dropped -17.97% vs QLEIX's -38.11%.
QLEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QAMNX and QLEIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer