QGRW vs. WINN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) and WINN (Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QGRW is passively managed, while WINN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QGRW returned 29.12%/yr vs 23.40%/yr for WINN. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QGRW charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for WINN.

Performance

QGRW vs. WINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) and Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGRW achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly higher than WINN's 7.28% return.

QGRW

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 8.02%
• YTD: 15.43%
• 6M: 14.33%
• 1Y: 35.04%
• 3Y*: 29.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WINN

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 4.97%
• YTD: 7.28%
• 6M: 5.80%
• 1Y: 19.61%
• 3Y*: 23.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QGRW vs. WINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	15.43%	19.20%	34.85%	56.05%	-3.30%
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	7.28%	14.31%	31.64%	52.44%	-3.51%

Correlation

The correlation between QGRW and WINN is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022	0.97

The correlation between QGRW and WINN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

QGRW vs. WINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QGRW	WINN
Technology	52.1%	49.2%
Communication Services	17.8%	15.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	13.3%
Industrials	8.0%	4.9%
Healthcare	4.3%	6.8%
Financial Services	4.1%	5.1%
Energy	0.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	2.9%
Utilities	0.4%	1.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.4%

Return for Risk

QGRW vs. WINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGRW

QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 55
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 53

WINN

WINN Risk / Return Rank: 30
WINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
WINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
WINN Omega Ratio Rank: 34
WINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
WINN Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QGRW vs. WINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) and Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QGRW	WINN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.22	+0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	1.73	+0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.22	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	1.09	+1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.92	3.40	+5.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QGRW vs. WINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QGRW Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the WINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QGRW and WINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QGRW	WINN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	1.22	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.65	0.62	+1.04

Drawdowns

QGRW vs. WINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRW drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum WINN drawdown of -32.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRW and WINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	QGRW	WINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.40%	-32.07%	+7.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.44%	-18.06%	+2.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.40%	-23.66%	-0.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-1.88%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.26%	-9.08%	+5.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.94%	5.78%	-1.84%

Volatility

QGRW vs. WINN - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) at 4.01%. This indicates that QGRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QGRW	WINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	4.01%	+0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.67%	12.22%	+1.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.39%	16.12%	+1.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.07%	23.73%	-2.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.07%	23.73%	-2.66%

QGRW vs. WINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than WINN's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

QGRW vs. WINN - Dividend Comparison

QGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while WINN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	0.07%	0.09%	0.14%	0.11%	0.00%
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QGRW and WINN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, QGRW and WINN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QGRW or WINN?

QGRW has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to WINN (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRW dropped -24.40% vs WINN's -32.07%.

Which ETF is better, QGRW or WINN?

On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 29.12% vs 23.40% for WINN. On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, WINN has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QGRW or WINN?

Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 29.12% return vs 23.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QGRW or WINN?

QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for WINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QGRW or WINN?

QGRW has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for WINN.

What is the main difference between QGRW and WINN?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QGRW and 0.57% for WINN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.