QGRO vs. SCHC
QGRO (American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF) and SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index, while SCHC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QGRO returned 10.34%/yr vs 5.82%/yr for SCHC. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QGRO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for SCHC.
Performance
QGRO vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than SCHC's 4.65% return.
QGRO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- 6M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 5.76%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.34%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.79%
SCHC
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 4.65%
- 1Y
- 15.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.92%
QGRO vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRO American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.22% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 32.42% | -24.54% | 24.57% | 37.99% | 35.09% | -16.08% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 4.65% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -21.74% | 12.02% | 10.48% | 23.10% | -14.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRO and SCHC is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018 | 0.71 |
The correlation between QGRO and SCHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
QGRO vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QGRO
SCHC
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
QGRO
SCHC
Communication Services
QGRO
SCHC
Industrials
QGRO
SCHC
Healthcare
QGRO
SCHC
Consumer Cyclical
QGRO
SCHC
Financial Services
QGRO
SCHC
Consumer Defensive
QGRO
SCHC
Energy
QGRO
SCHC
Utilities
QGRO
SCHC
Real Estate
QGRO
SCHC
Basic Materials
QGRO
SCHC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRO vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank
QGRO
SCHC
QGRO vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QGRO | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.17 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 1.23 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.42 | 3.97 | -2.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QGRO vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, smaller than the maximum SCHC drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and SCHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRO | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.56% | -43.94% | +11.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -12.48% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.82% | -15.30% | -8.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | -36.48% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.11% | -7.55% | +4.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -10.02% | +2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 3.85% | +0.23% |
Volatility
QGRO vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison
American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) at 4.14%. This indicates that QGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRO | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 4.14% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.84% | 14.33% | -1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.08% | 16.46% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 17.62% | +3.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.86% | 17.80% | +5.06% |
QGRO vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRO vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison
QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than SCHC's 3.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRO American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.54% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QGRO and SCHC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QGRO has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to SCHC (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRO dropped -32.56% vs SCHC's -43.94%.
On 5-year performance, QGRO leads with 10.34% vs 5.82% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SCHC has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QGRO has performed better with a 10.34% return vs 5.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for QGRO.
SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 0.19% for QGRO.
QGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHC is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. QGRO tracks American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index, while SCHC tracks FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QGRO and 0.08% for SCHC.
SCHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QGRO and SCHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer