PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QGRO vs. QINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QGRO vs. QINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than QINT's 10.31% return.


QGRO

1D
0.14%
1M
3.95%
YTD
2.33%
6M
2.50%
1Y
10.57%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*

QINT

1D
0.81%
1M
2.48%
YTD
10.31%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.43%
3Y*
21.17%
5Y*
8.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QGRO vs. QINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QGRO
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF
2.33%15.18%31.42%32.42%-24.54%24.57%37.99%35.09%-16.85%
QINT
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
10.31%38.12%6.53%20.36%-19.75%9.29%17.95%23.46%-14.13%

Correlation

The correlation between QGRO and QINT is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

0.72

The correlation between QGRO and QINT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

QGRO vs. QINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QGRO
QINT

Technology

37.1%
8.9%

Industrials

13.6%
19.0%

Healthcare

12.7%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
13.6%

Communication Services

11.0%
4.4%

Financial Services

5.9%
19.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
5.8%

Energy

1.8%
6.4%

Utilities

0.9%
1.6%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.0%

Basic Materials

0.3%
9.4%

Technology

QGRO
37.1%
QINT
8.9%

Industrials

QGRO
13.6%
QINT
19.0%

Healthcare

QGRO
12.7%
QINT
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

QGRO
12.0%
QINT
13.6%

Communication Services

QGRO
11.0%
QINT
4.4%

Financial Services

QGRO
5.9%
QINT
19.8%

Consumer Defensive

QGRO
3.8%
QINT
5.8%

Energy

QGRO
1.8%
QINT
6.4%

Utilities

QGRO
0.9%
QINT
1.6%

Real Estate

QGRO
0.9%
QINT
1.0%

Basic Materials

QGRO
0.3%
QINT
9.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QGRO vs. QINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGRO
QGRO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

QINT
QINT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
QINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
QINT Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
QINT Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QGRO vs. QINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QGROQINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.32

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

2.33

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.63

9.39

-6.77

QGRO vs. QINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the QINT Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QGRO and QINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QGROQINTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

1.79

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.56

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.58

+0.09

Drawdowns

QGRO vs. QINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, roughly equal to the maximum QINT drawdown of -33.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and QINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QGROQINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.56%

-33.86%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.54%

-11.41%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.82%

-13.56%

-10.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.86%

-33.86%

+2.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.14%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-7.54%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

2.82%

+1.21%

Volatility

QGRO vs. QINT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) is 3.37%, while American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that QGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QGROQINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

4.71%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

12.37%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.32%

14.83%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.05%

16.22%

+4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.92%

18.06%

+4.86%

QGRO vs. QINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QINT's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

QGRO vs. QINT - Dividend Comparison

QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than QINT's 2.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QGRO
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF
0.19%0.25%0.25%0.41%0.46%0.31%0.22%0.38%0.13%
QINT
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
2.48%2.66%3.49%3.12%3.56%2.30%1.61%1.83%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


QGRO and QINT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QINT has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to QGRO (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRO dropped -32.56% vs QINT's -33.86%.

On 5-year performance, QGRO leads with 12.25% vs 8.99% for QINT. On fees, QGRO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QGRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QGRO has performed better with a 12.25% return vs 8.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QGRO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QINT.

QINT has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 0.19% for QGRO.

QGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QINT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. QGRO tracks iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR), while QINT tracks Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QGRO and 0.39% for QINT.

QINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QGRO and QINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer