QGRO vs. FITZ
QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QGRO is passively managed, while FITZ is actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QGRO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.
Performance
QGRO vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QGRO
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 3.95%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 10.57%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QGRO vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.91% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRO and FITZ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRO vs. FITZ — Risk / Return Rank
QGRO
FITZ
QGRO vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGRO | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRO | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | -7.29 | +7.96 |
Drawdowns
QGRO vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -1.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and FITZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRO | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.56% | -1.97% | -30.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -1.97% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -1.08% | -6.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | — | — |
Volatility
QGRO vs. FITZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRO | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.32% | 8.74% | +6.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 8.74% | +12.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 8.74% | +14.18% |
QGRO vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRO vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison
QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, while FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QGRO and FITZ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QGRO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QGRO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.
QGRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QGRO and 0.75% for FITZ.
Find the right allocation for QGRO and FITZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer