QGLDX vs. FSAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about The Gold Bullion Strategy Fund Investor Class (QGLDX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX).
QGLDX is managed by Quantified Funds. It was launched on Apr 19, 2016. FSAGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 15, 1985.
Performance
QGLDX vs. FSAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QGLDX vs. FSAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGLDX The Gold Bullion Strategy Fund Investor Class | 4.26% | 59.91% | 24.52% | 10.39% | -4.64% | -6.25% | 19.35% | 17.03% | -4.07% | 11.44% |
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio | 1.81% | 143.05% | 14.97% | -0.37% | -13.46% | -10.44% | 26.83% | 35.50% | -13.00% | 8.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGLDX achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly higher than FSAGX's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, QGLDX has underperformed FSAGX with an annualized return of 10.94%, while FSAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.04% annualized return.
QGLDX
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -14.50%
- YTD
- 4.26%
- 6M
- 15.79%
- 1Y
- 41.00%
- 3Y*
- 28.74%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
FSAGX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -25.44%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- 1Y
- 84.71%
- 3Y*
- 36.44%
- 5Y*
- 20.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QGLDX vs. FSAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGLDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FSAGX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QGLDX vs. FSAGX — Risk / Return Rank
QGLDX
FSAGX
QGLDX vs. FSAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gold Bullion Strategy Fund Investor Class (QGLDX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGLDX | FSAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 2.02 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 2.29 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.84 | -0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.43 | 10.66 | -2.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGLDX | FSAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.02 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.62 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.43 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.22 | +0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between QGLDX and FSAGX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QGLDX vs. FSAGX - Dividend Comparison
QGLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.07%, more than FSAGX's 2.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGLDX The Gold Bullion Strategy Fund Investor Class | 58.07% | 60.49% | 28.70% | 10.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.92% | 14.32% | 1.23% | 5.75% | 2.08% |
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio | 2.13% | 2.17% | 3.62% | 0.99% | 0.36% | 1.60% | 4.40% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 3.57% |
Drawdowns
QGLDX vs. FSAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGLDX drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, smaller than the maximum FSAGX drawdown of -77.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGLDX and FSAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGLDX | FSAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.17% | -77.21% | +50.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.22% | -29.85% | +10.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.34% | -45.94% | +22.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.17% | -50.57% | +23.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.52% | -25.44% | +8.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.28% | -33.41% | +22.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.19% | 7.95% | -2.76% |
Volatility
QGLDX vs. FSAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Gold Bullion Strategy Fund Investor Class (QGLDX) is 10.16%, while Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a volatility of 15.39%. This indicates that QGLDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QGLDX | FSAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.16% | 15.39% | -5.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.91% | 35.05% | -11.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.56% | 42.73% | -15.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 32.76% | -14.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 33.05% | -16.71% |