PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QGLDX vs. USG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QGLDX vs. USG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Gold Bullion Strategy Fund Investor Class (QGLDX) and USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund (USG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGLDX achieves a -3.09% return, which is significantly higher than USG's -5.03% return.


QGLDX

1D
-0.61%
1M
-6.91%
YTD
-3.09%
6M
-7.25%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
27.06%
5Y*
15.65%
10Y*
9.29%

USG

1D
-1.71%
1M
-8.44%
YTD
-5.03%
6M
-8.55%
1Y
16.66%
3Y*
24.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QGLDX vs. USG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QGLDX
The Gold Bullion Strategy Fund Investor Class
-3.09%59.91%24.52%10.39%-4.64%1.79%
USG
USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund
-5.03%52.02%23.70%8.49%2.12%3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between QGLDX and USG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021

0.82

The correlation between QGLDX and USG shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QGLDX vs. USG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGLDX
QGLDX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
QGLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
QGLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

USG
USG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
USG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USG Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
USG Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
USG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
USG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QGLDX vs. USG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gold Bullion Strategy Fund Investor Class (QGLDX) and USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund (USG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QGLDXUSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.15

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

0.73

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.51

2.06

+0.45

QGLDX vs. USG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QGLDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the USG Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QGLDX and USG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QGLDX vs. USG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGLDX drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, which is greater than USG's maximum drawdown of -22.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGLDX and USG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QGLDXUSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.17%

-22.96%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.65%

-22.96%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.65%

-22.96%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.40%

-22.40%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.35%

-4.51%

-6.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.02%

8.11%

+0.91%

Volatility

QGLDX vs. USG - Volatility Comparison

The Gold Bullion Strategy Fund Investor Class (QGLDX) and USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund (USG) have volatilities of 8.28% and 8.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QGLDXUSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.28%

8.00%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.28%

22.84%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.52%

24.33%

+3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.42%

16.09%

+2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.61%

16.09%

+0.52%

QGLDX vs. USG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGLDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than USG's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

QGLDX vs. USG - Dividend Comparison

QGLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.47%, more than USG's 29.34% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QGLDX
The Gold Bullion Strategy Fund Investor Class
62.47%60.49%28.70%10.20%0.00%0.00%9.92%14.32%1.23%5.75%2.08%
USG
USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund
29.34%27.33%7.48%8.16%2.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, QGLDX and USG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QGLDX has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to USG (8.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGLDX dropped -27.17% vs USG's -22.96%.

QGLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QGLDX and USG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer