PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QFLR vs. YSEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QFLR vs. YSEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QFLR achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than YSEP's 7.61% return.


QFLR

1D
1.49%
1M
-0.51%
6M
0.88%
YTD
3.44%
1Y
16.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.62%

YSEP

1D
0.27%
1M
1.28%
6M
4.69%
YTD
7.61%
1Y
16.77%
3Y*
11.99%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.00M$2.42M$2.41M
$299.83K$230.29K$404.18K

QFLR vs. YSEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QFLR and YSEP is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024

0.58

The correlation between QFLR and YSEP shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QFLR vs. YSEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QFLR
QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

YSEP
YSEP Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
YSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
YSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
YSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
YSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QFLR vs. YSEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QFLRYSEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.40

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

3.10

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.90

12.95

-6.05

QFLR vs. YSEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QFLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the YSEP Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QFLR and YSEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QFLR vs. YSEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFLR drawdown since its inception was -13.97%, smaller than the maximum YSEP drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFLR and YSEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QFLRYSEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.97%

-22.58%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.93%

-5.43%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

0.00%

-3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-4.02%

+1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

1.30%

+1.05%

Volatility

QFLR vs. YSEP - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP) at 1.97%. This indicates that QFLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YSEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QFLRYSEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

1.97%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.33%

6.55%

+4.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.05%

7.95%

+6.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.42%

11.30%

+2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.42%

11.30%

+2.12%

QFLR vs. YSEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than YSEP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

QFLR vs. YSEP - Dividend Comparison

Neither QFLR nor YSEP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


QFLR and YSEP have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QFLR has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to YSEP (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QFLR dropped -13.97% vs YSEP's -22.58%.

On 1-year performance, YSEP leads with 16.77% vs 16.15% for QFLR. On fees, QFLR is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, YSEP has been the lower-risk option at 1.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YSEP has performed better with a 16.77% return vs 16.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QFLR is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for YSEP.

QFLR and YSEP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

QFLR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while YSEP is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for QFLR and 0.90% for YSEP.

YSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QFLR and YSEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer