PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YSEP vs. GMAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YSEP vs. GMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YSEP vs. GMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
YSEP
FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September
0.60%19.88%4.63%11.41%
GMAR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March
1.83%9.29%12.14%11.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YSEP achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than GMAR's 1.83% return.


YSEP

1D
1.55%
1M
-3.52%
YTD
0.60%
6M
2.63%
1Y
15.14%
3Y*
10.81%
5Y*
10Y*

GMAR

1D
1.56%
1M
0.87%
YTD
1.83%
6M
3.97%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
11.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YSEP vs. GMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

YSEP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

YSEP vs. GMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YSEP
YSEP Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
YSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
YSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
YSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
YSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

GMAR
GMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YSEP vs. GMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YSEPGMARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

1.43

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.26

2.09

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.45

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.83

+0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.33

11.88

-1.55

YSEP vs. GMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YSEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the GMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YSEP and GMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YSEPGMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

1.43

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.69

-1.15

Correlation

The correlation between YSEP and GMAR is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

YSEP vs. GMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither YSEP nor GMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

YSEP vs. GMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YSEP drawdown since its inception was -22.58%, which is greater than GMAR's maximum drawdown of -9.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YSEP and GMAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


YSEPGMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.58%

-9.11%

-13.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.65%

-6.85%

+1.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

-0.26%

-3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-0.57%

-3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

1.05%

+0.39%

Volatility

YSEP vs. GMAR - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) at 2.18%. This indicates that YSEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


YSEPGMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

2.18%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.75%

2.84%

+2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.37%

8.50%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.50%

6.96%

+4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.50%

6.96%

+4.54%