PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QFLR vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QFLR vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QFLR vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QFLR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
-2.22%17.27%16.64%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
-4.82%14.96%5.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QFLR achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly higher than QQQY's -4.82% return.


QFLR

1D
0.66%
1M
-2.97%
YTD
-2.22%
6M
0.78%
1Y
23.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY

1D
1.19%
1M
-3.30%
YTD
-4.82%
6M
-3.93%
1Y
14.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QFLR vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QFLR vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QFLR
QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QFLR vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QFLRQQQYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

0.91

+1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.62

1.16

+1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.18

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

1.44

+1.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.59

4.79

+8.81

QFLR vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QFLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QFLR and QQQY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QFLRQQQYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

0.91

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.66

+0.45

Correlation

The correlation between QFLR and QQQY is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QFLR vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

QFLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.97%.


TTM202520242023
QFLR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
0.00%0.02%0.03%0.00%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
44.97%45.34%83.34%20.64%

Drawdowns

QFLR vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFLR drawdown since its inception was -13.97%, smaller than the maximum QQQY drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFLR and QQQY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QFLRQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.97%

-19.05%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-11.30%

+3.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.77%

-7.05%

+2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-3.04%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

3.40%

-1.63%

Volatility

QFLR vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) is 4.97%, while Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a volatility of 6.38%. This indicates that QFLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QFLRQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

6.38%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.49%

11.21%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.32%

16.45%

-4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.89%

14.68%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.89%

14.68%

-1.79%