PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQY vs. YMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQY vs. YMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY achieves a 18.54% return, which is significantly higher than YMAX's 3.82% return.


QQQY

1D
2.23%
1M
3.07%
YTD
18.54%
6M
18.12%
1Y
34.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YMAX

1D
2.26%
1M
1.43%
YTD
3.82%
6M
1.79%
1Y
5.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQY vs. YMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQQY and YMAX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2024

0.80

The correlation between QQQY and YMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQY vs. YMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

YMAX
YMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
YMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY vs. YMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQYYMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.06

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

0.22

+2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.62

0.52

+12.10

QQQY vs. YMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the YMAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY and YMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQY vs. YMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, smaller than the maximum YMAX drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY and YMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQYYMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.05%

-26.13%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-26.13%

+14.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-7.96%

+7.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-6.39%

+3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

11.20%

-8.47%

Volatility

QQQY vs. YMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) is 7.93%, while YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) has a volatility of 10.93%. This indicates that QQQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQYYMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.93%

10.93%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.38%

19.58%

-6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

23.45%

-8.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.29%

23.61%

-8.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.29%

23.61%

-8.32%

QQQY vs. YMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQY vs. YMAX - Dividend Comparison

QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.44%, less than YMAX's 73.58% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
34.44%45.34%83.34%20.64%
YMAX
YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs
73.58%78.70%44.20%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQY and YMAX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YMAX has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to QQQY (7.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQY dropped -19.05% vs YMAX's -26.13%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 34.32% vs 5.78% for YMAX. On fees, QQQY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, QQQY has been the lower-risk option at 7.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 34.32% return vs 5.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAX.

YMAX has the higher dividend yield at 73.58%, compared with 34.44% for QQQY.

QQQY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while YMAX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for QQQY and 1.28% for YMAX.

QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQY and YMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer