QFLR vs. POCT
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT).
QFLR and POCT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QFLR is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jan 24, 2024. POCT is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2018.
Performance
QFLR vs. POCT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QFLR vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF | -2.86% | 17.27% | 16.64% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | -1.84% | 11.00% | 8.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QFLR achieves a -2.86% return, which is significantly lower than POCT's -1.84% return.
QFLR
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- -3.49%
- YTD
- -2.86%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 23.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POCT
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 10.97%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QFLR vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than POCT's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QFLR vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank
QFLR
POCT
QFLR vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QFLR | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 1.06 | +0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.61 | 1.61 | +1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.26 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 1.58 | +1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.18 | 8.51 | +4.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QFLR | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.06 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.79 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between QFLR and POCT is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QFLR vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison
Neither QFLR nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
QFLR vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFLR drawdown since its inception was -13.97%, smaller than the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFLR and POCT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFLR | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.97% | -18.80% | +4.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.61% | -7.20% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.40% | -2.75% | -2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -1.53% | -1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 1.33% | +0.42% |
Volatility
QFLR vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) at 3.28%. This indicates that QFLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QFLR | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 3.28% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 5.13% | +4.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 10.35% | +1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.90% | 7.90% | +5.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.90% | 10.31% | +2.59% |