PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QFLR vs. POCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QFLR vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QFLR vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QFLR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
-2.86%17.27%16.64%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
-1.84%11.00%8.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QFLR achieves a -2.86% return, which is significantly lower than POCT's -1.84% return.


QFLR

1D
2.40%
1M
-3.49%
YTD
-2.86%
6M
0.45%
1Y
23.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

POCT

1D
1.72%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
-1.84%
6M
0.02%
1Y
10.97%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QFLR vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than POCT's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QFLR vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QFLR
QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

POCT
POCT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QFLR vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QFLRPOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.90

1.06

+0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.61

1.61

+1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.26

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

1.58

+1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.18

8.51

+4.68

QFLR vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QFLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the POCT Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QFLR and POCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QFLRPOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

1.06

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.79

+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between QFLR and POCT is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QFLR vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither QFLR nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
QFLR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
0.00%0.02%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%

Drawdowns

QFLR vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFLR drawdown since its inception was -13.97%, smaller than the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFLR and POCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QFLRPOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.97%

-18.80%

+4.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-7.20%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.40%

-2.75%

-2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-1.53%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

1.33%

+0.42%

Volatility

QFLR vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) at 3.28%. This indicates that QFLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QFLRPOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

3.28%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

5.13%

+4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

10.35%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.90%

7.90%

+5.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.90%

10.31%

+2.59%