PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POCT vs. XXXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POCT vs. XXXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, POCT achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly lower than XXXX's 33.15% return.


POCT

1D
0.10%
1M
2.06%
YTD
5.54%
6M
6.22%
1Y
15.20%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*

XXXX

1D
0.50%
1M
20.10%
YTD
33.15%
6M
31.59%
1Y
96.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POCT vs. XXXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
5.54%11.00%9.54%2.03%
XXXX
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN
33.15%17.36%61.36%16.31%

Correlation

The correlation between POCT and XXXX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023

0.90

The correlation between POCT and XXXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POCT vs. XXXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

POCT
POCT Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

XXXX
XXXX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XXXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXXX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XXXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXXX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

POCT vs. XXXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


POCTXXXXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

2.08

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.56

2.48

+1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.33

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

2.71

+0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.14

10.36

+7.78

POCT vs. XXXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current POCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the XXXX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of POCT and XXXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


POCTXXXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.08

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.90

-0.02

Drawdowns

POCT vs. XXXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POCT drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, smaller than the maximum XXXX drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POCT and XXXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POCTXXXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.80%

-62.27%

+43.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.40%

-37.25%

+32.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-11.62%

+10.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

9.72%

-8.86%

Volatility

POCT vs. XXXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) is 0.92%, while MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a volatility of 10.91%. This indicates that POCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XXXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POCTXXXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

10.91%

-9.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.78%

35.33%

-30.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.16%

46.75%

-40.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.94%

60.77%

-52.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.23%

60.77%

-50.54%

POCT vs. XXXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

POCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than XXXX's 2.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

POCT vs. XXXX - Dividend Comparison

Neither POCT nor XXXX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%
XXXX
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, POCT and XXXX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XXXX has higher volatility (10.91%) compared to POCT (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POCT dropped -18.80% vs XXXX's -62.27%.

On 1-year performance, XXXX leads with 96.61% vs 15.20% for POCT. On fees, POCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XXXX has performed better with a 96.61% return vs 15.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

POCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.

POCT and XXXX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

POCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while XXXX is Leveraged Equities. POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index, while XXXX tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Max. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for POCT and 2.95% for XXXX.

POCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POCT and XXXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer