POCT vs. XXXX
POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) and XXXX (MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - POCT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index, while XXXX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, POCT returned 15.20% vs 96.61% for XXXX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. POCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 2.95%/yr for XXXX.
Performance
POCT vs. XXXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POCT achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly lower than XXXX's 33.15% return.
POCT
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 5.54%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 15.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- —
XXXX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 20.10%
- YTD
- 33.15%
- 6M
- 31.59%
- 1Y
- 96.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POCT vs. XXXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 5.54% | 11.00% | 9.54% | 2.03% |
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | 33.15% | 17.36% | 61.36% | 16.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between POCT and XXXX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023 | 0.90 |
The correlation between POCT and XXXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POCT vs. XXXX — Risk / Return Rank
POCT
XXXX
POCT vs. XXXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| POCT | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.48 | 2.08 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.56 | 2.48 | +1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.33 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 2.71 | +0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.14 | 10.36 | +7.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| POCT | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 2.08 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.90 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
POCT vs. XXXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POCT drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, smaller than the maximum XXXX drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POCT and XXXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POCT | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.80% | -62.27% | +43.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.40% | -37.25% | +32.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -11.62% | +10.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 9.72% | -8.86% |
Volatility
POCT vs. XXXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) is 0.92%, while MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a volatility of 10.91%. This indicates that POCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XXXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POCT | XXXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | 10.91% | -9.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.78% | 35.33% | -30.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.16% | 46.75% | -40.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.94% | 60.77% | -52.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.23% | 60.77% | -50.54% |
POCT vs. XXXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
POCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than XXXX's 2.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
POCT vs. XXXX - Dividend Comparison
Neither POCT nor XXXX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.21% |
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, POCT and XXXX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XXXX has higher volatility (10.91%) compared to POCT (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, POCT dropped -18.80% vs XXXX's -62.27%.
On 1-year performance, XXXX leads with 96.61% vs 15.20% for POCT. On fees, POCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XXXX has performed better with a 96.61% return vs 15.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
POCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.
POCT and XXXX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
POCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while XXXX is Leveraged Equities. POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index, while XXXX tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Max. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for POCT and 2.95% for XXXX.
POCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for POCT and XXXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer