QFIN vs. SMH
QFIN (360 DigiTech, Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 5 years, QFIN returned -10.51%/yr vs 39.21%/yr for SMH. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QFIN vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QFIN achieves a -16.41% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return.
QFIN
- 1D
- -8.21%
- 1M
- 13.60%
- YTD
- -16.41%
- 6M
- -15.14%
- 1Y
- -59.36%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- -10.51%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
QFIN vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFIN 360 DigiTech, Inc. | -16.41% | -47.46% | 162.76% | -16.28% | -6.54% | 97.15% | 20.68% | -36.99% | -6.02% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -1.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFIN and SMH is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2018 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFIN vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
QFIN
SMH
QFIN vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 360 DigiTech, Inc. (QFIN) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QFIN | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.72 | -0.96 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 10.59 | -11.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | 40.63 | -41.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QFIN | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.08 | 5.19 | -6.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 1.13 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.34 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
QFIN vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFIN drawdown since its inception was -76.74%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFIN and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFIN | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.74% | -84.96% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.31% | -14.93% | -57.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.15% | -35.74% | -37.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.74% | -45.30% | -31.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.97% | 0.00% | -64.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.45% | -41.09% | -4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.90% | 3.89% | +48.01% |
Volatility
QFIN vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
360 DigiTech, Inc. (QFIN) has a higher volatility of 29.66% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 11.47%. This indicates that QFIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFIN | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.66% | 11.47% | +18.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.48% | 24.29% | +14.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.87% | 30.56% | +24.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.91% | 35.01% | +31.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.14% | 32.57% | +39.57% |
Dividends
QFIN vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
QFIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.13%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFIN 360 DigiTech, Inc. | 10.13% | 7.58% | 4.56% | 7.27% | 4.03% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFIN and SMH have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QFIN has higher volatility (29.66%) compared to SMH (11.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QFIN dropped -76.74% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QFIN and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer