PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QFHD vs. INCE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QFHD vs. INCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QFHD

1D
-0.29%
1M
1.83%
6M
8.33%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

INCE

1D
0.47%
1M
0.96%
6M
8.29%
YTD
14.91%
1Y
26.00%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$621.36K$657.47K$945.62K
$8.06K$29.95K$25.81K

QFHD vs. INCE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QFHD and INCE is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QFHD vs. INCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QFHD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


INCE
INCE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
INCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
INCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QFHD vs. INCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QFHDINCEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.20

QFHD vs. INCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QFHD vs. INCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum INCE drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and INCE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QFHDINCEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.52%

-33.95%

+28.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-0.16%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.77%

-3.22%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

Volatility

QFHD vs. INCE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QFHDINCEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.91%

8.40%

+2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.91%

13.25%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.91%

15.60%

-4.69%

QFHD vs. INCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than INCE's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

QFHD vs. INCE - Dividend Comparison

QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than INCE's 4.84% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
4.84%4.71%3.25%1.75%1.68%1.41%1.40%1.31%1.55%1.44%0.50%
QFHD
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF
1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QFHD and INCE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, INCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

INCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QFHD.

INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.84%, compared with 1.29% for QFHD.

QFHD is categorized as Quality Factor, while INCE is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.29% for INCE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QFHD and INCE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer