QFHD vs. HIGH
QFHD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF) and HIGH (Simplify Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFHD is a Quality Factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend Index, while HIGH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Simplify. QFHD is passively managed, while HIGH is actively managed. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QFHD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HIGH.
Performance
QFHD vs. HIGH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFHD
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 8.33%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HIGH
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- -1.00%
- 1Y
- -1.25%
- 3Y*
- 2.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $264.89K | $245.02K | $537.34K | |
| $8.06K | $29.95K | $25.81K |
QFHD vs. HIGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 11.66% |
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF | -1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFHD and HIGH is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFHD vs. HIGH — Risk / Return Rank
QFHD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HIGH
QFHD vs. HIGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QFHD | HIGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.97 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.21 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QFHD vs. HIGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFHD drawdown since its inception was -5.52%, smaller than the maximum HIGH drawdown of -9.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFHD and HIGH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFHD | HIGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -9.50% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -7.69% | +5.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.77% | -2.59% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.46% | — |
Volatility
QFHD vs. HIGH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFHD | HIGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.91% | 7.23% | +3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.91% | 9.46% | +1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.91% | 9.46% | +1.45% |
QFHD vs. HIGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFHD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HIGH's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFHD vs. HIGH - Dividend Comparison
QFHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than HIGH's 6.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF | 6.88% | 7.71% | 8.34% | 9.40% | 0.62% |
QFHD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFHD and HIGH have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QFHD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QFHD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HIGH.
HIGH has the higher dividend yield at 6.88%, compared with 1.29% for QFHD.
QFHD is categorized as Quality Factor, while HIGH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFHD and 0.50% for HIGH.
Find the right allocation for QFHD and HIGH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer