PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIGH vs. HYBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIGH vs. HYBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) and SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF (HYBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIGH achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than HYBL's 1.31% return.


HIGH

1D
0.18%
1M
1.82%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
-1.07%
1Y
-2.66%
3Y*
3.13%
5Y*
10Y*

HYBL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.31%
6M
2.02%
1Y
6.71%
3Y*
8.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIGH vs. HYBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
-0.05%4.35%1.52%7.70%0.27%
HYBL
SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF
1.31%7.78%9.12%11.86%1.36%

Correlation

The correlation between HIGH and HYBL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2022

0.26

The correlation between HIGH and HYBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIGH vs. HYBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIGH
HIGH Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
HIGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIGH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
HIGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIGH Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

HYBL
HYBL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
HYBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYBL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HYBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYBL Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIGH vs. HYBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) and SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF (HYBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIGHHYBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.30

2.54

-2.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.37

3.88

-4.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.52

-0.57

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.26

2.76

-3.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.38

10.17

-10.55

HIGH vs. HYBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIGH Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the HYBL Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIGH and HYBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIGHHYBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

2.54

-2.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.26

-0.86

Drawdowns

HIGH vs. HYBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIGH drawdown since its inception was -9.50%, which is greater than HYBL's maximum drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIGH and HYBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIGHHYBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.50%

-8.46%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-2.41%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.50%

-4.32%

-5.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.81%

0.00%

-6.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-1.35%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.51%

0.66%

+5.85%

Volatility

HIGH vs. HYBL - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) has a higher volatility of 1.18% compared to SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF (HYBL) at 0.65%. This indicates that HIGH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIGHHYBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

0.65%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.63%

2.14%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

2.65%

+6.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.56%

4.58%

+4.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.56%

4.58%

+4.98%

HIGH vs. HYBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIGH has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than HYBL's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIGH vs. HYBL - Dividend Comparison

HIGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.31%, more than HYBL's 7.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
7.31%7.71%8.34%9.40%0.62%
HYBL
SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF
7.10%7.22%7.88%7.93%5.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIGH and HYBL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIGH has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to HYBL (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIGH dropped -9.50% vs HYBL's -8.46%.

On 3-year performance, HYBL leads with 8.65% vs 3.13% for HIGH. On fees, HIGH is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, HYBL has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HYBL has performed better with a 8.65% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HIGH is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HYBL.

HIGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.31%, compared with 7.10% for HYBL.

HIGH is categorized as Derivative Income, while HYBL is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for HIGH and 0.70% for HYBL.

HYBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIGH and HYBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer