PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QEFA vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QEFA vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QEFA achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, QEFA has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.67%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


QEFA

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.69%
YTD
6.80%
6M
8.78%
1Y
17.29%
3Y*
14.76%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
8.67%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QEFA vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QEFA
SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF
6.80%29.25%2.27%17.40%-14.03%12.50%6.76%21.91%-10.39%24.03%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QEFA and VOO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014

0.67

The correlation between QEFA and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

QEFA vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QEFA
VOO

Financial Services

14.3%
11.6%

Healthcare

11.6%
8.5%

Technology

10.1%
35.7%

Industrials

8.7%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
10.2%

Energy

5.1%
3.5%

Basic Materials

4.9%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
4.9%

Communication Services

3.3%
11.3%

Utilities

2.7%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.9%

Financial Services

QEFA
14.3%
VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

QEFA
11.6%
VOO
8.5%

Technology

QEFA
10.1%
VOO
35.7%

Industrials

QEFA
8.7%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QEFA
5.7%
VOO
10.2%

Energy

QEFA
5.1%
VOO
3.5%

Basic Materials

QEFA
4.9%
VOO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

QEFA
4.2%
VOO
4.9%

Communication Services

QEFA
3.3%
VOO
11.3%

Utilities

QEFA
2.7%
VOO
2.4%

Real Estate

QEFA
1.8%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QEFA vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QEFA
QEFA Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
QEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
QEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
QEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
QEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QEFA vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QEFAVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

3.16

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

14.73

-8.20

QEFA vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QEFA and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QEFAVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.39

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.83

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.87

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.89

-0.46

Drawdowns

QEFA vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.71%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEFA and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QEFAVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.71%

-33.99%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.58%

-8.90%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.23%

-18.69%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

-24.52%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.71%

-33.99%

+2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.93%

-0.70%

-2.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-3.69%

-2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

1.91%

+0.75%

Volatility

QEFA vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that QEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QEFAVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

2.84%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

8.90%

+1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

11.80%

+0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

16.81%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.03%

18.01%

-1.98%

QEFA vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEFA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

QEFA vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

QEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QEFA
SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF
2.87%3.13%3.17%2.79%3.02%2.37%1.82%2.95%3.22%2.33%2.01%2.94%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


QEFA and VOO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QEFA has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QEFA dropped -31.71% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 8.67% for QEFA. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for QEFA.

QEFA has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

QEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. QEFA tracks MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for QEFA and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QEFA and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer