QEFA vs. ACWI
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI).
QEFA and ACWI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QEFA is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series (USD). It was launched on Jun 4, 2014. ACWI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World Index. It was launched on Mar 26, 2008. Both QEFA and ACWI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QEFA or ACWI.
Correlation
The correlation between QEFA and ACWI is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QEFA vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QEFA:
0.54
ACWI:
1.83
QEFA:
0.81
ACWI:
2.47
QEFA:
1.10
ACWI:
1.33
QEFA:
0.60
ACWI:
2.71
QEFA:
1.52
ACWI:
10.87
QEFA:
4.09%
ACWI:
2.02%
QEFA:
11.55%
ACWI:
11.97%
QEFA:
-31.71%
ACWI:
-56.00%
QEFA:
-8.49%
ACWI:
-2.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QEFA achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 1.79% return. Over the past 10 years, QEFA has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 6.51%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 9.62% annualized return.
QEFA
1.35%
1.16%
-2.44%
5.59%
4.35%
6.51%
ACWI
1.79%
2.05%
6.31%
19.67%
9.95%
9.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QEFA vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QEFA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QEFA vs. ACWI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
QEFA
ACWI
QEFA vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QEFA vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
QEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than ACWI's 1.67% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QEFA SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF | 3.13% | 3.17% | 2.79% | 3.02% | 2.37% | 1.82% | 2.95% | 3.22% | 2.34% | 2.01% | 2.94% | 1.14% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.67% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.25% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% | 2.26% |
Drawdowns
QEFA vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.71%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEFA and ACWI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QEFA vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) is 3.36%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 4.68%. This indicates that QEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.