QEFA vs. ACWI

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QEFA (SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QEFA returned 8.72%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for ACWI. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QEFA charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

QEFA vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QEFA achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 13.06% return. Over the past 10 years, QEFA has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 8.72%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.94% annualized return.

QEFA

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 7.32%
• 6M: 9.90%
• 1Y: 16.78%
• 3Y*: 14.95%
• 5Y*: 7.93%
• 10Y*: 8.72%

ACWI

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 5.48%
• YTD: 13.06%
• 6M: 14.33%
• 1Y: 30.55%
• 3Y*: 21.49%
• 5Y*: 11.67%
• 10Y*: 12.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QEFA vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QEFA SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF	7.32%	29.25%	2.27%	17.40%	-14.03%	12.50%	6.76%	21.91%	-10.39%	24.03%
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	13.06%	22.41%	17.45%	22.27%	-18.39%	18.66%	16.34%	26.59%	-9.19%	24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between QEFA and ACWI is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014	0.77

The correlation between QEFA and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

QEFA vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QEFA	ACWI
Financial Services	14.3%	16.1%
Healthcare	11.6%	8.1%
Technology	10.1%	29.4%
Industrials	8.7%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	9.3%
Energy	5.1%	4.2%
Basic Materials	4.9%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	5.0%
Communication Services	3.3%	9.0%
Utilities	2.7%	2.6%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

QEFA vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QEFA

QEFA Risk / Return Rank: 37
QEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
QEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
QEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 35
QEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
QEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 42

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 71
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QEFA vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QEFA	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	2.41	-1.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	3.31	-1.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.44	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	3.24	-1.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.79	14.58	-7.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QEFA vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QEFA and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QEFA	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	2.41	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.73	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.76	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.43	0.00

Drawdowns

QEFA vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.71%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEFA and ACWI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QEFA	ACWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.71%	-56.00%	+24.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.58%	-9.73%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.23%	-16.55%	+4.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.09%	-26.42%	-1.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.71%	-33.53%	+1.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.46%	0.00%	-2.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.08%	-8.61%	+2.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	2.16%	+0.49%

Volatility

QEFA vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.88%. This indicates that QEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QEFA	ACWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.12%	3.88%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.24%	10.27%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.78%	12.77%	+0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.77%	16.05%	-1.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.03%	17.11%	-1.08%

QEFA vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEFA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

QEFA vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

QEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than ACWI's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.37%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%
QEFA SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF	2.86%	3.13%	3.17%	2.79%	3.02%	2.37%	1.82%	2.95%	3.22%	2.33%	2.01%	2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QEFA and ACWI in my portfolio?

QEFA and ACWI have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QEFA or ACWI?

QEFA has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to ACWI (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QEFA dropped -31.71% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

Which ETF is better, QEFA or ACWI?

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.94% vs 8.72% for QEFA. On fees, QEFA is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QEFA or ACWI?

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.94% return vs 8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QEFA or ACWI?

QEFA is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QEFA or ACWI?

QEFA has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 1.37% for ACWI.

What is the main difference between QEFA and ACWI?

QEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. QEFA tracks MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for QEFA and 0.32% for ACWI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.