PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDTE vs. VOTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QDTE vs. VOTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QDTE vs. VOTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QDTE having a -3.92% return and VOTE slightly higher at -3.84%.


QDTE

1D
1.50%
1M
-4.27%
YTD
-3.92%
6M
0.35%
1Y
21.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOTE

1D
0.88%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
-3.84%
6M
-1.77%
1Y
18.40%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QDTE vs. VOTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VOTE's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QDTE vs. VOTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VOTE
VOTE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VOTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOTE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTE vs. VOTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDTEVOTEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

1.00

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

1.52

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.23

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.57

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.99

7.30

-1.32

QDTE vs. VOTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the VOTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTE and VOTE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDTEVOTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.00

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.63

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between QDTE and VOTE is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QDTE vs. VOTE - Dividend Comparison

QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.17%, more than VOTE's 1.04% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
QDTE
Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
51.17%49.49%32.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOTE
Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF
1.04%1.03%1.18%1.33%1.54%0.54%

Drawdowns

QDTE vs. VOTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, smaller than the maximum VOTE drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and VOTE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QDTEVOTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.86%

-25.71%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-12.07%

-2.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.92%

-5.68%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-6.34%

+3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

2.59%

+1.09%

Volatility

QDTE vs. VOTE - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) at 5.40%. This indicates that QDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QDTEVOTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

5.40%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

9.74%

+2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.37%

18.50%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.71%

17.30%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

17.30%

+1.41%