QDTE vs. VITL

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, QDTE returned 34.41% vs -67.42% for VITL. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

QDTE vs. VITL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTE achieves a 12.44% return, which is significantly higher than VITL's -68.50% return.

QDTE

• 1D: 1.85%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 12.44%
• 6M: 11.71%
• 1Y: 34.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VITL

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 12.53%
• YTD: -68.50%
• 6M: -68.29%
• 1Y: -67.42%
• 3Y*: -10.77%
• 5Y*: -15.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTE vs. VITL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	12.44%	19.32%	16.07%
VITL Vital Farms, Inc.	-68.50%	-15.26%	89.40%

Correlation

The correlation between QDTE and VITL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024	0.15

The correlation between QDTE and VITL shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QDTE vs. VITL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTE

QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 74
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 74
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 78

VITL

VITL Risk / Return Rank: 5
VITL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
VITL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
VITL Omega Ratio Rank: 3
VITL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
VITL Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTE vs. VITL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QDTE	VITL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	-1.10	+3.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	-2.06	+4.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	0.76	+0.63
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	-0.80	+4.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.52	-1.43	+14.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QDTE vs. VITL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the VITL Sharpe Ratio of -1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTE and VITL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QDTE	VITL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	-1.10	+3.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.17	-0.36	+1.53

Drawdowns

QDTE vs. VITL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, smaller than the maximum VITL drawdown of -84.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and VITL.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDTE	VITL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.86%	-84.20%	+61.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.20%	-84.20%	+74.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-84.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-84.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.70%	-80.81%	+77.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.14%	-47.28%	+44.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	47.12%	-44.57%

Volatility

QDTE vs. VITL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) is 6.57%, while Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a volatility of 18.45%. This indicates that QDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VITL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDTE	VITL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.57%	18.45%	-11.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.26%	48.11%	-35.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.71%	61.49%	-45.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.72%	54.16%	-35.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.72%	53.74%	-35.02%

Dividends

QDTE vs. VITL - Dividend Comparison

QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.14%, while VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	44.14%	49.49%	32.09%
VITL Vital Farms, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDTE and VITL in my portfolio?

QDTE and VITL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QDTE or VITL?

VITL has higher volatility (18.45%) compared to QDTE (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTE dropped -22.86% vs VITL's -84.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.