QDTE vs. VITL
QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, QDTE returned 24.69% vs -63.21% for VITL. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QDTE vs. VITL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDTE achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly higher than VITL's -56.92% return.
QDTE
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -4.51%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- YTD
- 11.03%
- 1Y
- 24.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.39%
VITL
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 32.18%
- 6M
- -52.96%
- YTD
- -56.92%
- 1Y
- -63.21%
- 3Y*
- 8.81%
- 5Y*
- -6.89%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -14.48%
QDTE vs. VITL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 11.03% | 19.32% | 17.13% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | -56.92% | -15.26% | 98.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDTE and VITL is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.13 |
The correlation between QDTE and VITL shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDTE vs. VITL — Risk / Return Rank
QDTE
VITL
QDTE vs. VITL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDTE | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.80 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | -0.75 | +3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.94 | -1.18 | +10.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDTE vs. VITL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, smaller than the maximum VITL drawdown of -84.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and VITL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDTE | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.86% | -84.20% | +61.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.20% | -84.20% | +74.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -84.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.91% | -73.75% | +68.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -47.81% | +44.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 53.72% | -50.95% |
Volatility
QDTE vs. VITL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) is 7.01%, while Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a volatility of 16.40%. This indicates that QDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VITL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDTE | VITL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 16.40% | -9.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.25% | 50.11% | -35.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.46% | 63.17% | -45.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 54.54% | -35.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 53.75% | -34.69% |
Dividends
QDTE vs. VITL - Dividend Comparison
QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.99%, while VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 45.99% | 49.49% | 32.09% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDTE and VITL have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VITL has higher volatility (16.40%) compared to QDTE (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTE dropped -22.86% vs VITL's -84.20%.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDTE and VITL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer