QDTE vs. SCHA
QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while SCHA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. QDTE is actively managed, while SCHA is passively managed. Over the past year, QDTE returned 34.41% vs 36.31% for SCHA. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
QDTE vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDTE achieves a 12.44% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 17.78% return.
QDTE
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 12.44%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 34.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHA
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 17.78%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 36.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
QDTE vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 12.44% | 19.32% | 16.07% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 17.78% | 11.60% | 8.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDTE and SCHA is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.66 |
The correlation between QDTE and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
QDTE vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDTE
SCHA
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
QDTE
SCHA
Basic Materials
QDTE
-
SCHA
Communication Services
QDTE
-
SCHA
Consumer Cyclical
QDTE
-
SCHA
Consumer Defensive
QDTE
-
SCHA
Energy
QDTE
-
SCHA
Healthcare
QDTE
-
SCHA
Industrials
QDTE
-
SCHA
Real Estate
QDTE
-
SCHA
Technology
QDTE
-
SCHA
Utilities
QDTE
-
SCHA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDTE vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
QDTE
SCHA
QDTE vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDTE | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.34 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 3.84 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.52 | 14.05 | -0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDTE | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 2.00 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.57 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
QDTE vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDTE | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.86% | -42.41% | +19.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.20% | -9.50% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.70% | -2.50% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.14% | -7.58% | +4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.59% | -0.04% |
Volatility
QDTE vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) at 5.79%. This indicates that QDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDTE | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.57% | 5.79% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.26% | 13.28% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 18.31% | -2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 21.98% | -3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 22.74% | -4.02% |
QDTE vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDTE vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.14%, more than SCHA's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 44.14% | 49.49% | 32.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDTE and SCHA have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDTE has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to SCHA (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTE dropped -22.86% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
On 1-year performance, SCHA leads with 36.31% vs 34.41% for QDTE. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHA has been the lower-risk option at 5.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 36.31% return vs 34.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.
QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 44.14%, compared with 1.02% for SCHA.
QDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while SCHA is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for QDTE and 0.04% for SCHA.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDTE and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer