QDTE vs. GIAX
QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and GIAX (Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QDTE returned 39.17% vs 31.31% for GIAX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.97% expense ratio.
Performance
QDTE vs. GIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDTE achieves a 16.06% return, which is significantly lower than GIAX's 21.71% return.
QDTE
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 16.06%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GIAX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 11.10%
- YTD
- 21.71%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 31.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDTE vs. GIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 16.06% | 19.32% | 13.05% |
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 21.71% | 11.73% | 3.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDTE and GIAX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024 | 0.84 |
The correlation between QDTE and GIAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
QDTE vs. GIAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDTE
GIAX
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
QDTE
GIAX
Basic Materials
QDTE
-
GIAX
Communication Services
QDTE
-
GIAX
Consumer Cyclical
QDTE
-
GIAX
Consumer Defensive
QDTE
-
GIAX
Energy
QDTE
-
GIAX
Healthcare
QDTE
-
GIAX
Industrials
QDTE
-
GIAX
Real Estate
QDTE
-
GIAX
Technology
QDTE
-
GIAX
Utilities
QDTE
-
GIAX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDTE vs. GIAX — Risk / Return Rank
QDTE
GIAX
QDTE vs. GIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDTE | GIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.27 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 1.79 | +2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.60 | 7.71 | +7.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDTE | GIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 1.44 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.96 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
QDTE vs. GIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, which is greater than GIAX's maximum drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and GIAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDTE | GIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.86% | -20.38% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.20% | -17.62% | +7.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -3.21% | +2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.14% | -2.99% | -0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 4.07% | -1.55% |
Volatility
QDTE vs. GIAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) is 3.72%, while Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) has a volatility of 8.08%. This indicates that QDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDTE | GIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 8.08% | -4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 19.81% | -8.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.81% | 21.77% | -6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 21.44% | -3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 21.44% | -3.02% |
QDTE vs. GIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QDTE and GIAX have an expense ratio of 0.97%.
Dividends
QDTE vs. GIAX - Dividend Comparison
QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.41%, more than GIAX's 22.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 22.41% | 25.62% | 10.58% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 43.41% | 49.49% | 32.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDTE and GIAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIAX has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to QDTE (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTE dropped -22.86% vs GIAX's -20.38%.
On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 39.17% vs 31.31% for GIAX. Both ETFs have the same 0.97% expense ratio. On volatility, QDTE has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 39.17% return vs 31.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDTE and GIAX have the same expense ratio: 0.97% per year.
QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 43.41%, compared with 22.41% for GIAX.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Nicholas.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDTE and GIAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer