QDPL vs. TRFK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) and TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDPL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pacer, while TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. QDPL is actively managed, while TRFK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QDPL returned 20.64%/yr vs 54.15%/yr for TRFK. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

QDPL vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDPL achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly lower than TRFK's 69.94% return.

QDPL

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 5.23%
• YTD: 10.40%
• 6M: 10.54%
• 1Y: 26.37%
• 3Y*: 20.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRFK

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 31.98%
• YTD: 69.94%
• 6M: 62.01%
• 1Y: 103.92%
• 3Y*: 54.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDPL vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	10.40%	16.52%	22.83%	23.66%	-2.97%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	69.94%	26.81%	38.30%	66.63%	-10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between QDPL and TRFK is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2022	0.80

The correlation between QDPL and TRFK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDPL vs. TRFK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QDPL	TRFK
Technology	27.6%	91.8%
Financial Services	10.3%	-
Communication Services	8.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	-
Healthcare	7.6%	-
Industrials	6.3%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	-
Energy	2.4%	-
Utilities	2.1%	-
Real Estate	1.5%	-
Basic Materials	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

QDPL vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDPL

QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 67
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 75

TRFK

TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 86
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 87
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDPL vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QDPL	TRFK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	3.78	-1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	4.39	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.55	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	5.34	-2.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.37	12.82	+1.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QDPL vs. TRFK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is lower than the TRFK Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDPL and TRFK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QDPL	TRFK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	3.78	-1.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	1.58	-0.75

Drawdowns

QDPL vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum TRFK drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and TRFK.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDPL	TRFK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.59%	-29.06%	+6.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.65%	-19.56%	+10.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.75%	-29.06%	+11.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-0.06%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.14%	-6.04%	+0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	8.13%	-6.29%

Volatility

QDPL vs. TRFK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) is 2.69%, while Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a volatility of 9.93%. This indicates that QDPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRFK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDPL	TRFK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.69%	9.93%	-7.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.00%	21.73%	-12.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.89%	27.70%	-15.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.01%	28.91%	-13.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.01%	28.91%	-13.90%

QDPL vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QDPL and TRFK have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

QDPL vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison

QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than TRFK's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	5.05%	4.84%	5.43%	6.30%	7.27%	2.44%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.40%	0.20%	0.56%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDPL and TRFK in my portfolio?

QDPL and TRFK have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QDPL or TRFK?

TRFK has higher volatility (9.93%) compared to QDPL (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDPL dropped -22.59% vs TRFK's -29.06%.

Which ETF is better, QDPL or TRFK?

On 3-year performance, TRFK leads with 54.15% vs 20.64% for QDPL. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, QDPL has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QDPL or TRFK?

Over the 3-year period, TRFK has performed better with a 54.15% return vs 20.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDPL or TRFK?

QDPL and TRFK have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QDPL or TRFK?

QDPL has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.

What is the main difference between QDPL and TRFK?

QDPL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TRFK is Technology Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRFK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.