QDPL vs. SPY
QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDPL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pacer, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. QDPL is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QDPL returned 20.64%/yr vs 22.35%/yr for SPY. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QDPL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
QDPL vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QDPL having a 10.40% return and SPY slightly higher at 10.91%.
QDPL
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 26.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
QDPL vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 10.40% | 16.52% | 22.83% | 23.66% | -16.25% | 8.32% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 9.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDPL and SPY is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021 | 0.95 |
The correlation between QDPL and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
QDPL vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDPL
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
QDPL
SPY
Financial Services
QDPL
SPY
Communication Services
QDPL
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
QDPL
SPY
Healthcare
QDPL
SPY
Industrials
QDPL
SPY
Consumer Defensive
QDPL
SPY
Energy
QDPL
SPY
Utilities
QDPL
SPY
Real Estate
QDPL
SPY
Basic Materials
QDPL
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDPL vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
QDPL
SPY
QDPL vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDPL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.43 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.16 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.37 | 14.72 | -0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDPL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 2.38 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.59 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
QDPL vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDPL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.59% | -55.19% | +32.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.65% | -8.88% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.75% | -18.76% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.70% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -9.05% | +3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 1.91% | -0.07% |
Volatility
QDPL vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) is 2.69%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that QDPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDPL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 2.84% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 8.90% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.89% | 11.83% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 17.05% | -2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 17.94% | -2.93% |
QDPL vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDPL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDPL vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 5.05% | 4.84% | 5.43% | 6.30% | 7.27% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, QDPL and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPY has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to QDPL (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDPL dropped -22.59% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 3-year performance, SPY leads with 22.35% vs 20.64% for QDPL. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, QDPL has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPY has performed better with a 22.35% return vs 20.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QDPL.
QDPL has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.
QDPL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QDPL and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDPL and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer