QDPL vs. SPCT
QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) and SPCT (Liberty One Spectrum ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. QDPL is passively managed, while SPCT is actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDPL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for SPCT.
Performance
QDPL vs. SPCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QDPL having a 10.05% return and SPCT slightly lower at 9.92%.
QDPL
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 20.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- —
SPCT
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 7.01%
- YTD
- 9.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDPL vs. SPCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 10.05% | 2.99% |
SPCT Liberty One Spectrum ETF | 9.92% | 1.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDPL and SPCT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDPL vs. SPCT — Risk / Return Rank
QDPL
SPCT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QDPL vs. SPCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Liberty One Spectrum ETF (SPCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDPL | SPCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.34 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDPL vs. SPCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, which is greater than SPCT's maximum drawdown of -7.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and SPCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDPL | SPCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.59% | -7.17% | -15.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | 0.00% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -1.49% | -3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | — | — |
Volatility
QDPL vs. SPCT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDPL | SPCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.47% | 9.27% | +3.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 9.27% | +5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 9.27% | +5.74% |
QDPL vs. SPCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDPL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SPCT's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDPL vs. SPCT - Dividend Comparison
QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than SPCT's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 4.54% | 4.84% | 5.43% | 6.30% | 7.27% | 2.44% |
SPCT Liberty One Spectrum ETF | 0.73% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDPL and SPCT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDPL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDPL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SPCT.
QDPL has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.73% for SPCT.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Liberty One. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QDPL and 0.85% for SPCT.
Find the right allocation for QDPL and SPCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer