QDPL vs. QSIAW

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Quantum-Si incorporated (QSIAW).

QDPL is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Jul 12, 2021.

Performance

QDPL vs. QSIAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Quantum-Si incorporated (QSIAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QDPL vs. QSIAW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	-3.59%	16.52%	22.83%	23.66%	-16.25%	8.32%
QSIAW Quantum-Si incorporated	-45.14%	-83.96%	295.68%	26.37%	-86.10%	-50.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDPL achieves a -3.59% return, which is significantly higher than QSIAW's -45.14% return.

QDPL

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -3.91%
• YTD: -3.59%
• 6M: -1.44%
• 1Y: 16.17%
• 3Y*: 16.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QSIAW

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -43.59%
• YTD: -45.14%
• 6M: -59.26%
• 1Y: -72.49%
• 3Y*: -9.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

QDPL vs. QSIAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDPL

QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 53
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 63

QSIAW

QSIAW Risk / Return Rank: 26
QSIAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
QSIAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
QSIAW Omega Ratio Rank: 39
QSIAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
QSIAW Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDPL vs. QSIAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Quantum-Si incorporated (QSIAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QDPL	QSIAW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	-0.36	+1.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	0.48	+0.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.06	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	-0.81	+2.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.55	-1.17	+7.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QDPL vs. QSIAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDPL Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the QSIAW Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDPL and QSIAW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QDPL	QSIAW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	-0.36	+1.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	-0.23	+0.87

Correlation

The correlation between QDPL and QSIAW is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QDPL vs. QSIAW - Dividend Comparison

QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, while QSIAW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	5.10%	4.84%	5.43%	6.30%	7.27%	2.44%
QSIAW Quantum-Si incorporated	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QDPL vs. QSIAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum QSIAW drawdown of -98.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and QSIAW.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDPL	QSIAW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.59%	-98.83%	+76.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.94%	-89.78%	+77.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.40%	-97.33%	+91.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.30%	-84.29%	+78.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.50%	62.03%	-59.53%

Volatility

QDPL vs. QSIAW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) is 5.36%, while Quantum-Si incorporated (QSIAW) has a volatility of 50.32%. This indicates that QDPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QSIAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDPL	QSIAW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.36%	50.32%	-44.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.41%	132.54%	-123.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.01%	199.51%	-181.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.11%	210.97%	-195.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.11%	210.97%	-195.86%