QSIAW vs. CNMD

In the year-to-date period, QSIAW achieves a -23.21% return, which is significantly lower than CNMD's -15.83% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantum-Si incorporated (QSIAW) and CONMED Corporation (CNMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current QSIAW Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the CNMD Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSIAW and CNMD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

QSIAW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%.

The maximum QSIAW drawdown since its inception was -98.83%, which is greater than CNMD's maximum drawdown of -76.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSIAW and CNMD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Quantum-Si incorporated (QSIAW) has a higher volatility of 72.02% compared to CONMED Corporation (CNMD) at 18.81%. This indicates that QSIAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quantum-Si incorporated and CONMED Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.