QDIV vs. RDIV
QDIV (Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF) and RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDIV is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index, while RDIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDIV returned 6.89%/yr vs 11.36%/yr for RDIV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDIV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RDIV.
Performance
QDIV vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDIV achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly lower than RDIV's 13.79% return.
QDIV
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- 7.99%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- 13.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- —
RDIV
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 6M
- 13.59%
- 1Y
- 28.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
QDIV vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 7.99% | 3.16% | 10.62% | 5.18% | -0.50% | 28.99% | 0.03% | 29.00% | -12.20% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 13.79% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 29.12% | -9.31% | 22.62% | -10.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDIV and RDIV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between QDIV and RDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
QDIV vs. RDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDIV
RDIV
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
-
Healthcare
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
QDIV
RDIV
Industrials
QDIV
RDIV
-
Healthcare
QDIV
RDIV
Energy
QDIV
RDIV
Technology
QDIV
RDIV
Basic Materials
QDIV
RDIV
Financial Services
QDIV
RDIV
Consumer Cyclical
QDIV
RDIV
Communication Services
QDIV
RDIV
Real Estate
QDIV
-
RDIV
Utilities
QDIV
-
RDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDIV vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank
QDIV
RDIV
QDIV vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDIV | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.37 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 5.95 | -4.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.31 | 17.00 | -12.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDIV vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDIV drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, smaller than the maximum RDIV drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIV and RDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDIV | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.20% | -49.97% | +8.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.97% | -4.84% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.81% | -17.91% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -24.89% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.15% | -2.54% | -1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -5.84% | +0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 1.69% | +1.48% |
Volatility
QDIV vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) is 3.42%, while Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that QDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDIV | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 4.58% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.08% | 9.01% | -0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 13.41% | -1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.26% | 17.48% | -2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 21.89% | -2.51% |
QDIV vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDIV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDIV vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison
QDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than RDIV's 3.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 3.00% | 3.13% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 3.02% | 2.44% | 3.06% | 2.84% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.72% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDIV and RDIV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDIV has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to QDIV (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDIV dropped -41.20% vs RDIV's -49.97%.
On 5-year performance, RDIV leads with 11.36% vs 6.89% for QDIV. On fees, QDIV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 11.36% return vs 6.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDIV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 3.00% for QDIV.
QDIV is categorized as Dividend, while RDIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. QDIV tracks S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index, while RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDIV and 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDIV and RDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer