QDIV vs. FDLO
QDIV (Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF) and FDLO (Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDIV is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index, while FDLO is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDIV returned 6.36%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for FDLO. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDIV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDLO.
Performance
QDIV vs. FDLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDIV achieves a 8.38% return, which is significantly higher than FDLO's 3.88% return.
QDIV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 8.38%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- 1Y
- 13.98%
- 3Y*
- 9.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.36%
- 10Y*
- —
FDLO
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 3.88%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 13.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- —
QDIV vs. FDLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 8.38% | 3.16% | 10.62% | 5.18% | -0.50% | 28.99% | 0.03% | 29.00% | -12.20% |
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF | 3.88% | 11.77% | 16.06% | 16.38% | -10.38% | 24.00% | 12.19% | 31.10% | -5.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDIV and FDLO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018 | 0.73 |
The correlation between QDIV and FDLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QDIV vs. FDLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDIV
FDLO
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
QDIV
FDLO
Industrials
QDIV
FDLO
Healthcare
QDIV
FDLO
Energy
QDIV
FDLO
Basic Materials
QDIV
FDLO
Technology
QDIV
FDLO
Financial Services
QDIV
FDLO
Consumer Cyclical
QDIV
FDLO
Communication Services
QDIV
FDLO
Real Estate
QDIV
-
FDLO
Utilities
QDIV
-
FDLO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDIV vs. FDLO — Risk / Return Rank
QDIV
FDLO
QDIV vs. FDLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDIV | FDLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 1.87 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.52 | 8.13 | -3.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDIV | FDLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.52 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.76 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.82 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
QDIV vs. FDLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDIV drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, which is greater than FDLO's maximum drawdown of -34.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIV and FDLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDIV | FDLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.20% | -34.35% | -6.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.97% | -7.13% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.81% | -13.68% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -19.23% | +0.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.81% | -1.97% | -1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.54% | -3.38% | -2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 1.64% | +1.46% |
Volatility
QDIV vs. FDLO - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) at 2.17%. This indicates that QDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDIV | FDLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.46% | 2.17% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.99% | 6.50% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 8.80% | +3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.30% | 13.07% | +2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.41% | 15.50% | +3.91% |
QDIV vs. FDLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDIV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FDLO's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDIV vs. FDLO - Dividend Comparison
QDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than FDLO's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF | 1.38% | 1.37% | 1.40% | 1.35% | 1.49% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.76% | 1.61% | 0.55% |
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 2.99% | 3.13% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 3.02% | 2.44% | 3.06% | 2.84% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDIV and FDLO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDIV has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to FDLO (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDIV dropped -41.20% vs FDLO's -34.35%.
On 5-year performance, FDLO leads with 9.84% vs 6.36% for QDIV. On fees, QDIV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FDLO has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDLO has performed better with a 9.84% return vs 6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDIV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDLO.
QDIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 1.38% for FDLO.
QDIV is categorized as Dividend, while FDLO is Volatility Hedged Equity. QDIV tracks S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index, while FDLO tracks Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDIV and 0.29% for FDLO.
FDLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDIV and FDLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer