PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDEF vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDEF vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDEF achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 13.09% return.


QDEF

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.68%
6M
8.64%
YTD
10.48%
1Y
20.97%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
12.14%
ALL TIME*
12.72%

QARP

1D
0.52%
1M
1.69%
6M
8.81%
YTD
13.09%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$110.48K$118.49K$177.11K
$546.87K$522.47K$732.31K

QDEF vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
10.48%17.43%21.19%17.48%-10.94%26.04%3.15%24.90%-2.18%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
13.09%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%14.83%30.70%-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between QDEF and QARP is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018

0.91

The correlation between QDEF and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDEF vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDEF
QARP

Technology

35.6%
24.1%

Financial Services

11.7%
12.4%

Healthcare

10.5%
14.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
9.4%

Communication Services

5.8%
10.5%

Industrials

5.5%
7.9%

Energy

4.2%
6.3%

Real Estate

3.9%
1.0%

Utilities

3.6%
1.9%

Basic Materials

3.5%
2.5%

Technology

QDEF
35.6%
QARP
24.1%

Financial Services

QDEF
11.7%
QARP
12.4%

Healthcare

QDEF
10.5%
QARP
14.0%

Consumer Defensive

QDEF
7.3%
QARP
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QDEF
7.3%
QARP
9.4%

Communication Services

QDEF
5.8%
QARP
10.5%

Industrials

QDEF
5.5%
QARP
7.9%

Energy

QDEF
4.2%
QARP
6.3%

Real Estate

QDEF
3.9%
QARP
1.0%

Utilities

QDEF
3.6%
QARP
1.9%

Basic Materials

QDEF
3.5%
QARP
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDEF vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QDEF
QDEF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QDEF vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDEFQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.41

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.37

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

15.08

-2.89

QDEF vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDEF and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDEF vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, roughly equal to the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEF and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDEFQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.74%

-35.44%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-7.26%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.43%

-15.65%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

-22.75%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.14%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.27%

-4.37%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.62%

+0.05%

Volatility

QDEF vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) is 2.29%, while Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) has a volatility of 2.59%. This indicates that QDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDEFQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

2.59%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

8.16%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.85%

10.71%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

15.52%

-1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

19.51%

-3.37%

QDEF vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDEF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDEF vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

QDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than QARP's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.02%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
1.58%1.74%1.85%2.21%2.42%1.84%2.50%3.17%7.10%2.70%2.90%3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDEF and QARP have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QARP has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to QDEF (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDEF dropped -35.74% vs QARP's -35.44%.

On 5-year performance, QDEF leads with 12.34% vs 11.83% for QARP. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QDEF has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.

QDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.02% for QARP.

QDEF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDEF and 0.19% for QARP.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDEF and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer