QDEF vs. KWIN
QDEF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund) and KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - QDEF tracks the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index while KWIN tracks the Wahed Alternative Income Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDEF charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for KWIN.
Performance
QDEF vs. KWIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDEF achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly higher than KWIN's 1.59% return.
QDEF
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- 19.43%
- 3Y*
- 18.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
KWIN
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDEF vs. KWIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 9.23% | 2.57% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 1.59% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDEF and KWIN is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDEF vs. KWIN — Risk / Return Rank
QDEF
KWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QDEF vs. KWIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDEF | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDEF vs. KWIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, which is greater than KWIN's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEF and KWIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDEF | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.74% | -1.50% | -34.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -1.44% | +1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -0.25% | -3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | — | — |
Volatility
QDEF vs. KWIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDEF | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.75% | 4.16% | +5.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.79% | 4.16% | +9.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 4.16% | +11.97% |
QDEF vs. KWIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDEF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than KWIN's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDEF vs. KWIN - Dividend Comparison
QDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 1.60% | 1.74% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 2.42% | 1.84% | 2.50% | 3.17% | 7.10% | 2.70% | 2.90% | 3.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDEF and KWIN have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDEF is cheaper at 0.37% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDEF is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for KWIN.
QDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.
QDEF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index, while KWIN tracks Wahed Alternative Income Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDEF and 0.51% for KWIN.
Find the right allocation for QDEF and KWIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer