KWIN vs. FDL
KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - KWIN tracks the Wahed Alternative Income Index while FDL tracks the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KWIN charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
KWIN vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KWIN achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 11.69% return.
KWIN
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- 20.92%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
KWIN vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 1.30% | 0.61% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 11.69% | 6.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between KWIN and FDL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KWIN vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
KWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDL
KWIN vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KWIN | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KWIN vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KWIN drawdown since its inception was -0.93%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWIN and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KWIN | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.93% | -65.93% | +65.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -3.93% | +3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.21% | -9.63% | +9.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.86% | — |
Volatility
KWIN vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KWIN | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.31% | 11.63% | -8.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 14.33% | -11.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 17.10% | -13.79% |
KWIN vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWIN has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
KWIN vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.80% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KWIN and FDL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for KWIN.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.
KWIN tracks Wahed Alternative Income Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for KWIN and 0.43% for FDL.
Find the right allocation for KWIN and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer