KWIN vs. FDL
KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - KWIN tracks the Wahed Alternative Income Index while FDL tracks the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KWIN charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
KWIN vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KWIN achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 16.72% return.
KWIN
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- YTD
- 16.72%
- 1Y
- 24.72%
- 3Y*
- 18.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.89%
KWIN vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 1.64% | 0.61% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 16.72% | 6.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between KWIN and FDL is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KWIN vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
KWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDL
KWIN vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KWIN | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KWIN vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KWIN drawdown since its inception was -1.58%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWIN and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KWIN | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -65.93% | +64.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -0.76% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -9.61% | +9.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.87% | — |
Volatility
KWIN vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KWIN | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.12% | 11.79% | -7.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.12% | 14.39% | -10.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.12% | 17.14% | -13.02% |
KWIN vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWIN has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
KWIN vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.63% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KWIN and FDL have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for KWIN.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.
KWIN tracks Wahed Alternative Income Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for KWIN and 0.43% for FDL.
Find the right allocation for KWIN and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer