PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KWIN vs. KHYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KWIN vs. KHYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN) and KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KWIN achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than KHYB's 2.83% return.


KWIN

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
1.30%
6M
1.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KHYB

1D
0.04%
1M
0.43%
YTD
2.83%
6M
2.88%
1Y
8.96%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
0.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KWIN vs. KHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KWIN and KHYB is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KWIN vs. KHYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KWIN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


KHYB
KHYB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
KHYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KHYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
KHYB Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
KHYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
KHYB Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KWIN vs. KHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN) and KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KWINKHYBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.15

KWIN vs. KHYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KWIN vs. KHYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KWIN drawdown since its inception was -0.93%, smaller than the maximum KHYB drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWIN and KHYB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KWINKHYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.93%

-33.63%

+32.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.29%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-9.62%

+9.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

Volatility

KWIN vs. KHYB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KWINKHYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.31%

3.43%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.31%

6.33%

-3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.31%

5.69%

-2.38%

KWIN vs. KHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

KWIN has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than KHYB's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

KWIN vs. KHYB - Dividend Comparison

KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.28%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
KHYB
KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF
8.28%7.59%10.11%15.55%9.67%6.22%4.76%4.86%2.56%
KWIN
KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KWIN and KHYB have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KWIN is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KWIN is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KHYB.

KHYB has the higher dividend yield at 8.28%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.

KWIN is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while KHYB is Emerging Markets Bonds. KWIN tracks Wahed Alternative Income Index, while KHYB tracks JP Morgan Asia Credit Index Non-Investment Grade Corporate Index.. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for KWIN and 0.69% for KHYB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KWIN and KHYB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer