QDEF vs. IUSV
QDEF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund) and IUSV (iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDEF is a Quality Factor fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index, while IUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDEF returned 12.14%/yr vs 11.91%/yr for IUSV. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QDEF charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSV.
Performance
QDEF vs. IUSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QDEF having a 10.48% return and IUSV slightly lower at 10.38%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QDEF having a 12.14% annualized return and IUSV not far behind at 11.91%.
QDEF
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.72%
IUSV
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 21.41%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $60.14M | $63.62M | $70.42M | |
| $546.87K | $522.47K | $732.31K |
QDEF vs. IUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 10.48% | 17.43% | 21.19% | 17.48% | -10.94% | 26.04% | 3.15% | 24.90% | -4.10% | 17.04% |
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 10.38% | 12.85% | 12.18% | 21.73% | -5.40% | 25.22% | 1.56% | 31.47% | -9.21% | 15.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDEF and IUSV is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2012 | 0.88 |
The correlation between QDEF and IUSV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
QDEF vs. IUSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDEF
IUSV
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
QDEF
IUSV
Financial Services
QDEF
IUSV
Healthcare
QDEF
IUSV
Consumer Defensive
QDEF
IUSV
Consumer Cyclical
QDEF
IUSV
Communication Services
QDEF
IUSV
Industrials
QDEF
IUSV
Energy
QDEF
IUSV
Real Estate
QDEF
IUSV
Utilities
QDEF
IUSV
Basic Materials
QDEF
IUSV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDEF vs. IUSV — Risk / Return Rank
QDEF
IUSV
QDEF vs. IUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDEF | IUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.36 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 3.13 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.20 | 12.16 | +0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDEF vs. IUSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, smaller than the maximum IUSV drawdown of -56.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEF and IUSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDEF | IUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.74% | -56.88% | +21.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | -6.36% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.43% | -17.76% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.37% | -17.95% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.74% | -37.54% | +1.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -1.12% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -6.26% | +2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 1.64% | +0.03% |
Volatility
QDEF vs. IUSV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) is 2.29%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) has a volatility of 2.67%. This indicates that QDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDEF | IUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.29% | 2.67% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.47% | 7.24% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.85% | 10.10% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 14.45% | -0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 16.99% | -0.85% |
QDEF vs. IUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDEF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDEF vs. IUSV - Dividend Comparison
QDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than IUSV's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 1.66% | 1.78% | 2.15% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 1.87% | 2.40% | 2.19% | 2.67% | 1.93% | 4.44% | 7.63% |
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 1.58% | 1.74% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 2.42% | 1.84% | 2.50% | 3.17% | 7.10% | 2.70% | 2.90% | 3.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDEF and IUSV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IUSV has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to QDEF (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDEF dropped -35.74% vs IUSV's -56.88%.
On 10-year performance, QDEF leads with 12.14% vs 11.91% for IUSV. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QDEF has performed better with a 12.14% return vs 11.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.
IUSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.58% for QDEF.
QDEF is categorized as Quality Factor, while IUSV is Large Cap Value Equities. QDEF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index, while IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDEF and 0.04% for IUSV.
QDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDEF and IUSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer