QDEF vs. GARP
QDEF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - QDEF tracks the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index while GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDEF returned 12.34%/yr vs 17.48%/yr for GARP. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QDEF charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
QDEF vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDEF achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 16.89% return.
QDEF
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.72%
GARP
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 28.85%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.65M | $25.43M | $23.00M | |
| $546.87K | $522.47K | $732.31K |
QDEF vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 10.48% | 17.43% | 21.19% | 17.48% | -10.94% | 26.04% | 2.25% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 16.89% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDEF and GARP is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020 | 0.78 |
The correlation between QDEF and GARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
QDEF vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDEF
GARP
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
QDEF
GARP
Financial Services
QDEF
GARP
Healthcare
QDEF
GARP
Consumer Defensive
QDEF
GARP
-
Consumer Cyclical
QDEF
GARP
Communication Services
QDEF
GARP
Industrials
QDEF
GARP
Energy
QDEF
GARP
Real Estate
QDEF
GARP
Utilities
QDEF
GARP
Basic Materials
QDEF
GARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDEF vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
QDEF
GARP
QDEF vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDEF | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.26 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.19 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.20 | 7.99 | +4.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDEF vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, which is greater than GARP's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEF and GARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDEF | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.74% | -31.34% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | -13.69% | +6.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.43% | -23.73% | +9.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.37% | -30.61% | +9.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -4.34% | +3.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -7.27% | +4.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 3.75% | -2.08% |
Volatility
QDEF vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) is 2.29%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that QDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDEF | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.29% | 5.68% | -3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.47% | 16.18% | -8.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.85% | 20.02% | -10.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 22.34% | -8.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 23.92% | -7.78% |
QDEF vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDEF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDEF vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
QDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than GARP's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 1.58% | 1.74% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 2.42% | 1.84% | 2.50% | 3.17% | 7.10% | 2.70% | 2.90% | 3.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDEF and GARP have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GARP has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to QDEF (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDEF dropped -35.74% vs GARP's -31.34%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 17.48% vs 12.34% for QDEF. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 17.48% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.
QDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.
QDEF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index, while GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDEF and 0.15% for GARP.
QDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDEF and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer