PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDEF vs. DGRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDEF vs. DGRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDEF achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly lower than DGRE's 22.89% return. Over the past 10 years, QDEF has outperformed DGRE with an annualized return of 12.14%, while DGRE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.22% annualized return.


QDEF

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.68%
6M
8.64%
YTD
10.48%
1Y
20.97%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
12.14%
ALL TIME*
12.72%

DGRE

1D
0.57%
1M
-3.14%
6M
14.70%
YTD
22.89%
1Y
42.31%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
8.22%
ALL TIME*
5.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$225.72K$519.73K$485.46K
$546.87K$522.47K$732.31K

QDEF vs. DGRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
10.48%17.43%21.19%17.48%-10.94%26.04%3.15%24.90%-4.10%17.04%
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
22.89%27.47%3.63%18.46%-21.86%2.55%10.85%21.12%-16.36%33.61%

Correlation

The correlation between QDEF and DGRE is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013

0.58

The correlation between QDEF and DGRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDEF vs. DGRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDEF
DGRE

Technology

35.6%
38.6%

Financial Services

11.7%
11.8%

Healthcare

10.5%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
2.6%

Communication Services

5.8%
0.8%

Industrials

5.5%
8.0%

Energy

4.2%
1.1%

Real Estate

3.9%
0.3%

Utilities

3.6%
0.9%

Basic Materials

3.5%
4.4%

Technology

QDEF
35.6%
DGRE
38.6%

Financial Services

QDEF
11.7%
DGRE
11.8%

Healthcare

QDEF
10.5%
DGRE
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

QDEF
7.3%
DGRE
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QDEF
7.3%
DGRE
2.6%

Communication Services

QDEF
5.8%
DGRE
0.8%

Industrials

QDEF
5.5%
DGRE
8.0%

Energy

QDEF
4.2%
DGRE
1.1%

Real Estate

QDEF
3.9%
DGRE
0.3%

Utilities

QDEF
3.6%
DGRE
0.9%

Basic Materials

QDEF
3.5%
DGRE
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDEF vs. DGRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QDEF
QDEF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRE
DGRE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DGRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QDEF vs. DGRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDEFDGREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.07

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

9.68

+2.51

QDEF vs. DGRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the DGRE Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDEF and DGRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDEF vs. DGRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRE drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEF and DGRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDEFDGREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.74%

-36.95%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-13.68%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.43%

-20.65%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

-33.43%

+12.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.74%

-36.95%

+1.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-9.16%

+8.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.27%

-11.93%

+8.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

4.33%

-2.66%

Volatility

QDEF vs. DGRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) is 2.29%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a volatility of 8.92%. This indicates that QDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDEFDGREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

8.92%

-6.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

22.64%

-15.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.85%

24.24%

-14.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

19.08%

-5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

19.98%

-3.84%

QDEF vs. DGRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDEF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRE's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDEF vs. DGRE - Dividend Comparison

QDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than DGRE's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.35%1.65%1.90%2.22%4.38%2.56%2.11%2.32%2.71%3.12%3.18%3.01%
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
1.58%1.74%1.85%2.21%2.42%1.84%2.50%3.17%7.10%2.70%2.90%3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDEF and DGRE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRE has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to QDEF (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDEF dropped -35.74% vs DGRE's -36.95%.

On 10-year performance, QDEF leads with 12.14% vs 8.22% for DGRE. On fees, DGRE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QDEF has performed better with a 12.14% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.

QDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.35% for DGRE.

They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDEF and 0.32% for DGRE.

QDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDEF and DGRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer