PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDEF vs. CGDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDEF vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDEF achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 14.16% return.


QDEF

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.68%
6M
8.64%
YTD
10.48%
1Y
20.97%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
12.14%
ALL TIME*
12.72%

CGDV

1D
0.63%
1M
1.21%
6M
11.03%
YTD
14.16%
1Y
25.16%
3Y*
22.55%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$192.53M$192.47M$184.78M
$546.87K$522.47K$732.31K

QDEF vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
10.48%17.43%21.19%17.48%-0.91%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
14.16%25.50%20.10%28.81%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between QDEF and CGDV is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.91

The correlation between QDEF and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDEF vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDEF
CGDV

Technology

35.6%
34.5%

Financial Services

11.7%
6.7%

Healthcare

10.5%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
12.6%

Communication Services

5.8%
9.8%

Industrials

5.5%
13.6%

Energy

4.2%
3.9%

Real Estate

3.9%
1.0%

Utilities

3.6%
1.0%

Basic Materials

3.5%
2.8%

Technology

QDEF
35.6%
CGDV
34.5%

Financial Services

QDEF
11.7%
CGDV
6.7%

Healthcare

QDEF
10.5%
CGDV
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

QDEF
7.3%
CGDV
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QDEF
7.3%
CGDV
12.6%

Communication Services

QDEF
5.8%
CGDV
9.8%

Industrials

QDEF
5.5%
CGDV
13.6%

Energy

QDEF
4.2%
CGDV
3.9%

Real Estate

QDEF
3.9%
CGDV
1.0%

Utilities

QDEF
3.6%
CGDV
1.0%

Basic Materials

QDEF
3.5%
CGDV
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDEF vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QDEF
QDEF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QDEF vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDEFCGDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.35

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

2.44

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

11.39

+0.81

QDEF vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDEF and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDEF vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEF and CGDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDEFCGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.74%

-21.82%

-13.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-9.75%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.43%

-14.28%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

0.00%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.27%

-3.52%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

2.09%

-0.42%

Volatility

QDEF vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) is 2.29%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that QDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDEFCGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

3.28%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

10.06%

-2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.85%

12.55%

-2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

15.48%

-1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

15.48%

+0.66%

QDEF vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDEF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDEF vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

QDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than CGDV's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.18%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
1.58%1.74%1.85%2.21%2.42%1.84%2.50%3.17%7.10%2.70%2.90%3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDEF and CGDV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGDV has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to QDEF (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDEF dropped -35.74% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 22.55% vs 17.66% for QDEF. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 22.55% return vs 17.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.

QDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.18% for CGDV.

QDEF is categorized as Quality Factor, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDEF and 0.33% for CGDV.

QDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDEF and CGDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer