PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDEF vs. CGDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDEF vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDEF achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 11.89% return.


QDEF

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.94%
YTD
8.81%
6M
8.87%
1Y
23.31%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
12.64%
10Y*
12.34%

CGDV

1D
-0.55%
1M
5.09%
YTD
11.89%
6M
12.43%
1Y
30.91%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDEF vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
8.81%17.43%21.19%17.48%-1.60%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
11.89%25.50%20.10%28.81%-2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QDEF and CGDV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.92

The correlation between QDEF and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDEF vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDEF
CGDV

Technology

32.8%
34.1%

Financial Services

11.5%
6.8%

Healthcare

11.4%
11.5%

Communication Services

7.7%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
10.6%

Industrials

6.7%
13.2%

Real Estate

5.4%
1.1%

Energy

4.0%
3.8%

Basic Materials

3.0%
2.9%

Utilities

2.9%
2.1%

Technology

QDEF
32.8%
CGDV
34.1%

Financial Services

QDEF
11.5%
CGDV
6.8%

Healthcare

QDEF
11.4%
CGDV
11.5%

Communication Services

QDEF
7.7%
CGDV
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

QDEF
7.4%
CGDV
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QDEF
7.3%
CGDV
10.6%

Industrials

QDEF
6.7%
CGDV
13.2%

Real Estate

QDEF
5.4%
CGDV
1.1%

Energy

QDEF
4.0%
CGDV
3.8%

Basic Materials

QDEF
3.0%
CGDV
2.9%

Utilities

QDEF
2.9%
CGDV
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDEF vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDEF
QDEF Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDEF vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDEFCGDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.50

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

3.18

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.62

15.06

-0.44

QDEF vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDEF and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDEFCGDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.68

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.24

-0.40

Drawdowns

QDEF vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDEF drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEF and CGDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDEFCGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.74%

-21.82%

-13.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-9.75%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.43%

-14.28%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.55%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-3.62%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

2.06%

-0.46%

Volatility

QDEF vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) is 2.31%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that QDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDEFCGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

3.09%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.16%

9.13%

-1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.62%

11.59%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.78%

15.48%

-1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

15.48%

+0.69%

QDEF vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDEF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDEF vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

QDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than CGDV's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.17%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
1.59%1.74%1.85%2.21%2.42%1.84%2.50%3.17%7.10%2.70%2.90%3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDEF and CGDV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGDV has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to QDEF (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDEF dropped -35.74% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 25.14% vs 19.60% for QDEF. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 25.14% return vs 19.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.

QDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 1.17% for CGDV.

They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDEF and 0.33% for CGDV.

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDEF and CGDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer