PortfoliosLab logo
CGDV vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CGDV and SCHG is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

CGDV vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CGDV:

0.60

SCHG:

0.50

Sortino Ratio

CGDV:

0.99

SCHG:

0.86

Omega Ratio

CGDV:

1.15

SCHG:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

CGDV:

0.73

SCHG:

0.53

Martin Ratio

CGDV:

3.06

SCHG:

1.78

Ulcer Index

CGDV:

3.42%

SCHG:

7.00%

Daily Std Dev

CGDV:

16.64%

SCHG:

24.88%

Max Drawdown

CGDV:

-21.81%

SCHG:

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

CGDV:

-4.74%

SCHG:

-10.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -6.76% return.


CGDV

YTD

0.93%

1M

2.84%

6M

-3.45%

1Y

9.90%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SCHG

YTD

-6.76%

1M

4.47%

6M

-6.25%

1Y

12.34%

5Y*

17.90%

10Y*

15.31%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGDV vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGDV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGDV vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGDV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CGDV is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CGDV is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CGDV is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CGDV is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CGDV is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CGDV is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHG is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHG is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHG is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CGDV vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CGDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGDV and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CGDV vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than SCHG's 0.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.61%1.60%1.66%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.44%0.40%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%1.09%

Drawdowns

CGDV vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.81%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CGDV vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...