CGDV vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
CGDV and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGDV is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Feb 22, 2022. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
CGDV vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CGDV vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | -2.26% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -2.89% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -10.59% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -20.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGDV achieves a -2.26% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -10.59% return.
CGDV
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- -6.44%
- YTD
- -2.26%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 20.99%
- 3Y*
- 21.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- -10.59%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- 16.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 16.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CGDV vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGDV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CGDV vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
CGDV
SCHG
CGDV vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGDV | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 0.75 | +0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.83 | 1.23 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.17 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 1.03 | +0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.64 | 3.54 | +5.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGDV | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 0.75 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.79 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between CGDV and SCHG is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CGDV vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.34% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
CGDV vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGDV drawdown since its inception was -21.82%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGDV and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGDV | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.82% | -34.59% | +12.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -16.41% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.15% | -13.34% | +6.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -5.22% | +1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 4.78% | -2.24% |
Volatility
CGDV vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is 5.60%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that CGDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CGDV | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 6.67% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 12.51% | -3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.77% | 22.43% | -5.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 22.32% | -6.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 21.51% | -5.89% |