QCMD vs. MSTZ
QCMD (Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QCMD charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
QCMD vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCMD achieves a -38.50% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -49.10% return.
QCMD
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -28.50%
- YTD
- -38.50%
- 6M
- -37.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ
- 1D
- -4.17%
- 1M
- 84.18%
- YTD
- -49.10%
- 6M
- -27.85%
- 1Y
- 77.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCMD vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares | -38.50% | -11.76% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -49.10% | 275.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCMD and MSTZ is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCMD vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
QCMD
MSTZ
QCMD vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares (QCMD) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCMD | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.01 | -0.53 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
QCMD vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCMD drawdown since its inception was -56.03%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCMD and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCMD | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.03% | -99.36% | +43.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -84.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.81% | -98.21% | +43.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -94.40% | +81.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 40.54% | — |
Volatility
QCMD vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCMD | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 37.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 125.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.28% | 140.15% | -92.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.28% | 170.19% | -122.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.28% | 170.19% | -122.91% |
QCMD vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCMD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCMD vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
QCMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares | 3.86% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCMD and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QCMD is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QCMD is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.
QCMD has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for QCMD and 1.05% for MSTZ.
Find the right allocation for QCMD and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer