QCMD vs. SPUU
QCMD (Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - QCMD is a Inverse Equities fund managed by Direxion, while SPUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (200%). At a correlation of -0.54, they often move in opposite directions. QCMD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
QCMD vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCMD achieves a -37.78% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 19.82% return.
QCMD
- 1D
- -5.39%
- 1M
- -32.32%
- YTD
- -37.78%
- 6M
- -38.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUU
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 10.01%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 53.61%
- 3Y*
- 38.21%
- 5Y*
- 20.19%
- 10Y*
- 24.77%
QCMD vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares | -37.78% | -11.76% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares | 19.82% | 23.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCMD and SPUU is -0.54, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | -0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCMD vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
QCMD
SPUU
QCMD vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares (QCMD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCMD | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.01 | 0.63 | -1.64 |
Drawdowns
QCMD vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCMD drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum SPUU drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCMD and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCMD | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.59% | -59.35% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.28% | -1.27% | -53.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.96% | -9.51% | -3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.12% | — |
Volatility
QCMD vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCMD | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.23% | 23.90% | +23.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.23% | 33.46% | +13.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.23% | 35.77% | +11.46% |
QCMD vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCMD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCMD vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
QCMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than SPUU's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares | 3.82% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares | 1.34% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCMD and SPUU have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for QCMD.
QCMD has the higher dividend yield at 3.82%, compared with 1.34% for SPUU.
QCMD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SPUU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for QCMD and 0.64% for SPUU.
Find the right allocation for QCMD and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer