QCMD vs. SEF

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

QCMD (Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares) and SEF (ProShares Short Financials) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past year, QCMD returned -38.22% vs -0.67% for SEF. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QCMD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SEF.

Performance

QCMD vs. SEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares (QCMD) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCMD achieves a -29.99% return, which is significantly lower than SEF's 3.69% return.

QCMD

• 1D: -4.04%
• 1M: 14.28%
• YTD: -29.99%
• 6M: -28.41%
• 1Y: -38.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SEF

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -2.84%
• YTD: 3.69%
• 6M: 5.55%
• 1Y: -0.67%
• 3Y*: -11.90%
• 5Y*: -6.42%
• 10Y*: -12.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCMD vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares	-29.99%	-11.76%
SEF ProShares Short Financials	3.69%	-3.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QCMD and SEF is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.32

Return for Risk

QCMD vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCMD

QCMD Risk / Return Rank: 3
QCMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
QCMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
QCMD Omega Ratio Rank: 3
QCMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
QCMD Martin Ratio Rank: 0

SEF

SEF Risk / Return Rank: 8
SEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
SEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
SEF Omega Ratio Rank: 8
SEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
SEF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCMD vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares (QCMD) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QCMD	SEF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.76	-0.05	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.94	0.04	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.00	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.68	-0.06	-0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.77	-0.14	-1.63

QCMD vs. SEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCMD Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the SEF Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCMD and SEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QCMD vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCMD drawdown since its inception was -56.03%, smaller than the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCMD and SEF.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCMD	SEF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.03%	-96.51%	+40.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.03%	-11.14%	-44.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.62%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.55%	-96.28%	+47.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.26%	-82.74%	+67.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.63%	4.79%	+16.84%

Volatility

QCMD vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares (QCMD) has a higher volatility of 24.90% compared to ProShares Short Financials (SEF) at 4.12%. This indicates that QCMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QCMD	SEF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.90%	4.12%	+20.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.26%	11.10%	+34.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.35%	14.39%	+35.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.35%	17.97%	+32.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.35%	20.48%	+29.87%

QCMD vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCMD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SEF's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

QCMD vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison

QCMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than SEF's 3.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares	4.27%	1.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SEF ProShares Short Financials	3.24%	4.33%	5.72%	4.43%	0.39%	0.00%	0.12%	1.25%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QCMD and SEF in my portfolio?

QCMD and SEF have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QCMD or SEF?

QCMD has higher volatility (24.90%) compared to SEF (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCMD dropped -56.03% vs SEF's -96.51%.

Which ETF is better, QCMD or SEF?

On 1-year performance, SEF leads with -0.67% vs -38.22% for QCMD. On fees, SEF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QCMD or SEF?

Over the 1-year period, SEF has performed better with a -0.67% return vs -38.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QCMD or SEF?

SEF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for QCMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QCMD or SEF?

QCMD has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 3.24% for SEF.

What is the main difference between QCMD and SEF?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for QCMD and 0.95% for SEF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.