PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCLN vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCLN vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCLN achieves a 52.00% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, QCLN has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 17.14%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.28% annualized return.


QCLN

1D
-0.62%
1M
13.54%
YTD
52.00%
6M
46.53%
1Y
117.87%
3Y*
12.00%
5Y*
2.04%
10Y*
17.14%

FDL

1D
0.78%
1M
0.32%
YTD
14.21%
6M
15.52%
1Y
25.50%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
11.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCLN vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
52.00%31.81%-18.86%-10.02%-30.37%-3.21%184.00%42.65%-12.38%32.34%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
14.21%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between QCLN and FDL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2007

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between QCLN and FDL has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QCLN vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QCLN
FDL

Industrials

30.2%
3.8%

Technology

20.8%
1.1%

Energy

13.2%
27.3%

Utilities

13.2%
6.5%

Basic Materials

9.4%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
3.8%

Financial Services

1.9%
15.1%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

14.7%

Healthcare

-

16.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

QCLN
30.2%
FDL
3.8%

Technology

QCLN
20.8%
FDL
1.1%

Energy

QCLN
13.2%
FDL
27.3%

Utilities

QCLN
13.2%
FDL
6.5%

Basic Materials

QCLN
9.4%
FDL
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QCLN
9.4%
FDL
3.8%

Financial Services

QCLN
1.9%
FDL
15.1%

Communication Services

QCLN

-

FDL
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

QCLN

-

FDL
14.7%

Healthcare

QCLN

-

FDL
16.8%

Real Estate

QCLN

-

FDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCLN vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCLN
QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCLN vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCLNFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.40

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.48

5.99

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.77

14.59

+11.18

QCLN vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCLN Sharpe Ratio is 3.42, which is higher than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCLN and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCLNFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42

2.27

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.89

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.66

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.45

-0.25

Drawdowns

QCLN vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCLN drawdown since its inception was -76.18%, which is greater than FDL's maximum drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLN and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCLNFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.18%

-65.93%

-10.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.86%

-4.27%

-11.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.08%

-12.24%

-43.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.49%

-16.46%

-53.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.73%

-41.40%

-30.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.47%

-1.41%

-20.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.44%

-9.66%

-33.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

1.75%

+2.84%

Volatility

QCLN vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a higher volatility of 12.57% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.95%. This indicates that QCLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCLNFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.57%

2.95%

+9.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.03%

7.85%

+18.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.68%

11.30%

+23.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.96%

14.31%

+23.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.90%

17.11%

+17.79%

QCLN vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCLN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

QCLN vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than FDL's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.65%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.15%0.25%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.24%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCLN and FDL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCLN has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to FDL (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCLN dropped -76.18% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, QCLN leads with 17.14% vs 11.28% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QCLN has performed better with a 17.14% return vs 11.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLN.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 0.15% for QCLN.

QCLN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. QCLN tracks NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QCLN and 0.45% for FDL.

QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCLN and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer