QCLN vs. CNRG
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG).
QCLN and CNRG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QCLN is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. It was launched on Feb 8, 2007. CNRG is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2018. Both QCLN and CNRG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QCLN or CNRG.
Correlation
The correlation between QCLN and CNRG is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QCLN vs. CNRG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QCLN:
-0.45
CNRG:
-0.33
QCLN:
-0.45
CNRG:
-0.28
QCLN:
0.95
CNRG:
0.97
QCLN:
-0.23
CNRG:
-0.17
QCLN:
-0.78
CNRG:
-0.74
QCLN:
19.20%
CNRG:
13.82%
QCLN:
33.36%
CNRG:
30.59%
QCLN:
-76.18%
CNRG:
-59.60%
QCLN:
-59.98%
CNRG:
-56.49%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCLN achieves a -17.16% return, which is significantly lower than CNRG's -14.03% return.
QCLN
-17.16%
3.58%
1.26%
-17.47%
7.70%
7.95%
CNRG
-14.03%
-1.39%
-3.51%
-13.24%
8.93%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QCLN vs. CNRG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCLN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CNRG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QCLN vs. CNRG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QCLN vs. CNRG - Dividend Comparison
QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than CNRG's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 0.74% | 0.76% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.30% | 0.85% | 1.03% | 0.45% | 1.25% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 0.41% |
CNRG SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF | 1.19% | 1.17% | 1.23% | 1.34% | 0.69% | 1.16% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QCLN vs. CNRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCLN drawdown since its inception was -76.18%, which is greater than CNRG's maximum drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLN and CNRG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QCLN vs. CNRG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a higher volatility of 9.34% compared to SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) at 7.26%. This indicates that QCLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.